Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House formulating contingencies for nuclear weapon use by Russia
The New Voice of the Ukraine ^ | 10/4/22 | Staff

Posted on 10/04/2022 4:52:57 AM PDT by JonPreston

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: JonPreston

Well, that makes me feel safe (NOT). Dear Lord in Heaven above, protect us innocents from the folly of these fools before they kill us all!


61 posted on 10/04/2022 6:43:16 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Progressivism is socialism. Venezuela is how it ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MalPearce

The Reagan years were red hot, it was an exciting time to be a part of his global struggle against Russia, Reagan was everywhere and employing every means to undermine, oppose, fight, entangle, weaken, frustrate, overpower, bluff, outsell, Russia.
Reagan was a masterful visionary man with a plan and I think his struggle to reach the presidency of the United States was mostly to put into practice his theories on how to destroy the Russian empire and end its threat to the world.


62 posted on 10/04/2022 6:49:22 AM PDT by ansel12 (NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry
Dear Lord in Heaven above, protect us innocents from the folly of these fools before they kill us all!

Amen

63 posted on 10/04/2022 6:49:25 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Here is my concern:

We have no clue what is happening in Russia.

We have no clue what is happening in DC.

For folks who dislike uncertainty this situation could not be worse.


64 posted on 10/04/2022 6:51:15 AM PDT by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

This. This is what those in power think. They know they will be safe in their well stocked bunkers and for the rest of us? Bye-Bye! If anyone thinks that most of the folks in DC give a flip about the rest of us every day people, you are dreaming. Why else would someone like Lindsey Graham or Biden want the US to test Putin to the point of nuclear war? What is the end game? Is this a game of chicken?


65 posted on 10/04/2022 6:59:40 AM PDT by JoJo354 (I am in mourning for the United States of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

So the plan is now “haul a$$ to NORAD, get in, lock the door. Plenty of booze and hookers already below”?


66 posted on 10/04/2022 7:11:19 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

There are no winners in a nuclear war.

M.A.D.


67 posted on 10/04/2022 7:25:04 AM PDT by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

The FR Gen. Jack D. Ripper’s can now all breath a sigh of relief in knowing that their president and Gen. Milley is preparing for the ICBM’s, tactical nukes and all out war.

We have done some stupid crap in the last 35 years but engaging in a thermonuclear war for the crap hole known as the Ukraine will be the: elites, globalists, RINO’s, warmongers and deep state’s epithet of final stupidity.


68 posted on 10/04/2022 8:38:18 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dforest

I’ve yet to find where Putin has threatened to use Nukes either in Ukraine or against us, as opposed to loud mouths who constantly escalate a false threat. If they really try to destroy Russia who knows what Putin will do?

Will Putin defend Russia as he said? He will, but he is not the one talking about using nukes, yet, we are, and as you said it is for cover.

These people are insane, not Putin. They are now expecting Putin to be removed “one way or another” and they are diabolical enough to attempt this.

Well, Russia has different ideas about that, for sure.


69 posted on 10/04/2022 9:16:02 AM PDT by katie didit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: katie didit

They are attempting a color revolution against Russia from Ukraine. It requires all this propaganda overkill day after day.

The idea is that all this will stop if Putin goes. That would just be the beginning though.

One way to make it stop would be for Biden and the NWO supporters to go and leave the world alone.


70 posted on 10/04/2022 9:35:54 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

good point


71 posted on 10/04/2022 9:37:43 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

This is utter madness. All for the want of a squirrel with which to divert America’s attention from a DISASTROUS administration’s performance and their very likely loss of the US House and Senate come November.


72 posted on 10/04/2022 9:38:03 AM PDT by Gaffer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
Why on earth conservatives are cheering for this war is beyond me.

They’re not really conservatives.

A lot of them were in favor of the vax mandates as well. They tend to take the Biden position on things more often than not.

73 posted on 10/04/2022 9:41:13 AM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Just now developing those plans, are we? I feel better now given we decided to started screwing with a nuclear power from the outset.


74 posted on 10/04/2022 9:41:43 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Wonder what Biden would do if Russia fomented a revolution in Mexico, installed a puppet government there, set up a few bioweapons labs there (for peaceful purposes of course), sailed a few warships up the Gulf of California and had the Mexican towns bordering the USA ask for help?


75 posted on 10/04/2022 9:44:24 AM PDT by CodeJockey ("The duty of a true Patriot is to protect his country from its government.” –Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
All for the want of a squirrel with which to divert America’s attention from a DISASTROUS administration’s performance and their very likely loss of the US House and Senate come November.

I highly doubt the 118th United States Congress will ever be formalized constitutionally. Nuclear war, or the threat, will preempt the Republican victory.

76 posted on 10/04/2022 9:44:58 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable

“There is no contingencies - They use nuclear weapons - we die bottom line. There is no winning in a nuclear war.”

There are at least a couple orders of magnitude between the calculated use of a small “backpack” type nuclear weapon and an all-out general nuclear war.

Almost anything done by US/NATO forces in response to a fraction of a kT equivalent yield blip of an explosion could be considered an escalation.


77 posted on 10/04/2022 10:11:38 AM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
Uhmmm NO.

There have been war plans/contingency plans since Washington was president.

It was the Departments of the Navy and War to make up all kinds of plans. This is a historical FACT.

Check our War Plan Red, a 1920s plan to invade Canada if we ever went to war with the British.

Since the DoD was formed from these departments in 1947, it has been the Pentagon's job to have all kinds of war/contingency plans. They change ALL the time. I was in Washington DC (escaped in 1991 for Europe) and at the DIA/Pentagon for 7 years. That's all we did, was game this, game that, calculate order of battle for everyone's military, always adding and subtracting based on the latest intelligence...

It was a lot of work, and we did it 24/7/365.

And even so, we still had 9/11. People here were furious as we didn't seem to have any plan on an enemy using commercial aircraft as weapons...

After 9/11, it became even more intense, as non-nation states, terrorist groups and even non-government organizations like the Red Cross had to be considered.

This isn't a Biden versus Trump thing either, or neocon versus paleocon. Grant did it, so did Garfield, Harrison, Cleveland, McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, FDR, Eisenhower, Reagan, even Jimmy Carter. All nations do this, including the Good Ole USA...

78 posted on 10/04/2022 10:58:46 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

If a leader lets the nuclear genie out of the bottle, no other leader will be able to put the genie back into the bottle.

5.56mm


79 posted on 10/04/2022 11:03:57 AM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho got to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

It isn’t safe at all. Even when I was stationed there in the late 70s, we used to say it would be called “Cheyenne Crater” post war. Ground Zero in so many ways. First Strike Priority.


80 posted on 10/04/2022 11:07:51 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson