Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Being the Pingmeister at the epicenter is like living in the eye of a hurricane.
Posted on 10/20/2022 8:36:46 PM PDT by lightman
Democratic gubernatorial nominee Josh Shapiro.’s overflowing campaign coffers underscore the importance of Pennsylvania to national politics—and the influence of government unions in elections.
With four weeks remaining until the mid-term elections, Shapiro reported raising a whopping $25.4 million in his latest campaign-finance report, bringing his total to a record $50.9 million since the beginning of 2021. This represents 47 percent more than Governor Tom Wolf raised in four years as an incumbent running for reelection. By contrast, Republican gubernatorial nominee Doug Mastriano has raised just over $5 million since the beginning of 2021.
Slightly more than half of Shapiro’s total comes from donors outside of Pennsylvania, compared to less than one-third of Mastriano’s.
Shapiro’s massive haul includes $5.6 million from the Democratic Governors Association plus a plethora of six- and seven-figure checks from the usual suspects of billionaires and celebrities. Notably, he received $500,000 from Michael Bloomberg and $120,000 from the Soros family. Among Shapiro’s largest individual donors are California billionaire Jennifer Duda, who gave $2 million; Silicon Valley physician Karla Jurvetson, who gave $1 million; and former PayPal exec William Harris Jr., who also gave $1 million. Recognized names such as Steven Spielberg and J.J. Abrams also donated to Shapiro’s campaign.
But among the largest bloc of Shapiro’s donors are those who typically make up the bread-and-butter fundraising of Democrats’ campaigns: union political action committees (PACs).
So far, government-union PACs have donated $3.6 million to Shapiro, while private-sector union PACs have donated $4.7 million. Meanwhile, Mastriano has received 0.028 percent of that—$1,000—from government-union PACS.
Government unions are among the most powerful special interests in Pennsylvania. Their influence in national elections is unquestionable. Beyond Shapiro’s campaign, they have spent millions to prop up the Democratic Party and other progressive causes.
In this campaign cycle alone, the main Pennsylvania government-union PACs have raised more than $10 million and spent nearly $7 million. As of mid-September, union leaders hold more than $6 million in campaign cash.
National affiliates of these same unions—including the National Education Association (NEA), the American Federation of Teachers, and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees—have spent more than $3 million in Pennsylvania this cycle alone.
Government-union spending is decidedly one-party-focused. Donations to Democratic Party committees totaled $293,500, compared to $39,000 for Republican committees.
The top ten individual recipients of Pennsylvania government-union PAC money have received, collectively, $4,911,779 in the 2021–22 cycle. Nine of these ten individuals are Democrats, led by Shapiro.
But government-union influence isn’t limited to direct campaign contributions. Government unions also spend millions of dollars in members’ dues—$96.5 million since 2007—on election-related activity and lobbying. While union dues cannot go directly to candidates, they can be used—and are used—to support independent expenditures for or against candidates or funneled to Super PACS.
For example, the Pennsylvania State Education Association, the state’s largest teachers’ union, and its parent union, the NEA, funnel money to a Super PAC called Pennsylvania Fund for Change. Fund for Change has run ads attacking Republicans to the tune of almost $10 million since 2018.
Nationally, government unions fund groups like Color for Change PAC, which advocates defunding the police, and the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, whose sole purpose is to gerrymander congressional maps to benefit Democrats.
Government unions maintain their power by forcing taxpayers to pay for unions’ political fundraising, using that fundraising to elect candidates to office, and then negotiating billion-dollar labor contracts with these elected officials.
Generally, it’s illegal to use taxpayer dollars for political purposes. But state law gives government-union executives a perk awarded to no other private organization: Pennsylvania state and local governments, including school districts, can use taxpayer-funded payroll systems to deduct union dues and PAC contributions from public employees’ paychecks and send this money to union executives.
Bolstered by these special privileges, Pennsylvania government unions have spent millions on politics—with Shapiro the greatest beneficiary of their largesse—just as the state has become a national focus for election dollars. Taxpayers must demand an end to these sham perks that finance political campaigns.
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Being the Pingmeister at the epicenter is like living in the eye of a hurricane.
Let's bring this into perspective:
In my PA County local food banks can purchase food from the larger regional food banks for $0.10/pound.
In that same County the Salvation Army can access a restricted bequest to provide $20.00 vouchers for shoes for needy families with school children.
St. Basil the Great, Fourth Century Archbishop of Cappodicea said:
The coat hanging unused in your closet belongs to the person who has none.
This spending is obscene and and sin before God!
Why? Because they know that they’ve got 2024 locked up if they maintain the governorship.
I’d say they got the PA locked up
Aye...in Pennsylvania the Cabinet officers are all appointed by the Governor...including the Secretary of State who oversees elections.
Current “acting” Secretary is a POC gal from NC who had worked for ACORN.
“St. Basil the Great, Fourth Century Archbishop of Cappodicea said:
The coat hanging unused in your closet belongs to the person who has none.”
No. It doesn’t.
L
“The bread in your cupboard belongs to the hungry; the coat hanging unused in your closet belongs to the one who needs it; the shoes rotting in your closet belong to the one who has no shoes; the money which you hoard up belongs to the poor. You do wrong to everyone you could help, but fail to help.”
You may continue to disagree.
“You may continue to disagree.”
Thank you. I will.
Enjoy your evening.
L
And I will, as well!
FReegards.
They’re doing as much for Mastriano as they did for Scott Wagner aka “Pennsylvania’s Trump” in 2018.
NADA.
That is ALL TRUE!!!!
Vote Mastriano and Oz!! The Dim candidates will be a LOUSY Governor and Senator, despite their fundraising success!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.