Posted on 01/05/2023 11:05:04 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
It’s not so very wrong, as the position requires balance. The Speaker does need to have powers, and if you negotiate or delegate away those powers, you essentially become impotent and meaningless.
It is the PEOPLE'S HOUSE not the fiefdom of a dictator. We are not liberals yearning for some "strong Swamper" to run our lives.
And Lutz's boy friend has made himself impotent and meaningless.
Here’s hoping.
Stop wasting time elect a guy who had diner with Klaus schwab the enemy globalists behind depopulation and the great reset
So, what! He had dinner with Schwab, likely means nothing!
Churchill while in Europe well before the war researching for his book on his ancestor John Churchill, later the Duke of Marlborough met with and interviewed Mussolini. Tried to set up a meeting with Hitler but Hitler wouldn’t allow himself to be questioned. He didn’t approve of the ‘question topics’.
How better to understand your potential adversary then a polite dinner conversation!
A speaker has to have power over flock. That power shouldn’t be abused, but it shouldn’t be abused by the general representatives. McCarthy has given away so much power, should a speaker ever be selected, each season will open with a prayer, the pledge and an order to vacate the chair.
Watch. He’s given away the store. No matter who the speaker ultimately will be , they will be neutered as far as leadership power goes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.