Posted on 01/28/2023 10:19:54 AM PST by lightman
The videos have debunked the conspiracy theories. At this point you are embarrassing yourself to continue them.
“ Did you watch the break-in video, then listen to the 911 call?”
Why do you ask?
I made no statement concerning the call or the “break-in video”.
I stated he had a cocktail glass in his hand (as seen in the police body cam video).
You confirmed my statement.
You have met these types in real life, with their own realities.
If you've heard the 911 call, it did sound like Paul was uncomfortable, and not able to say what he really wanted to. I think it is possible that Depape had been in the house for some time, and that Paul might have been trying to keep the guy calm by pouring himself a drink. As in, "Hey, mind if I pour myself a drink?"
That doesn't do much to explain the weirdness of both of them when they opened the door, though again, I think Paul might have been extremely nervous about what Depape might do, so he was again trying to be calm. Obviously, it didn't help once Depape decided he was going to smack Paul in the head with the hammer.
I can see P. Pelosi winning an Oscar, Grammy, and Golden Globe from the liberal RATS for his performance in this film.
Crazyman broke the glass at 2:05, and PP called the cops at 2:27. Twenty minutes is a very long time. Was the dude was just wandering around the house? Were they talking? Making drinks? Or...
Do we even know this guy’s whereabouts prior to breaking the window? Or do the prosecutors not want to know?
It looked to me like Paul Pelosi was heroic in a horrible situation. The crazy with the hammer was NOT a friend of Pelosi - he’s a mental case.
We were wrong on this one - and so was the equally wrong left wing who tried to blame it on MAGA.
It was a break in.... a criminal act. Period. I hope if any of us are in the same position we’ll act as smart and thoughtful as Pelosi.
Listen to the 911 call. I think it gives good context to what was going on. Basically, this whacko broke into the house, and Paul was trying to defuse him/the situation as much as he could. Of course, this doesn't explain how there was basically no security at/around that house.
As a public service:
Argumentum ad lapidem (Latin: “appeal to the stone”) is a logical fallacy that consists in dismissing a statement as absurd without giving proof of its absurdity.
Ad lapidem statements are fallacious because they fail to address the merits of the claim in dispute. The same applies to proof by assertion, where an unproved or disproved claim is asserted as true on no ground other than that of its truth having been asserted. From Cognitive-Liberty.online
“”Someone rings your doorbell at 2 am and you decide to pour yourself a drink before going down to answer but forget to put on some pants or jammies? Nuh Uhh. Doesn’t work for me””
Here is a 2-minute video of the guy getting into the house, it is not ringing the doorbell.
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/video/paul-pelosi-attack-security-camera-video-shows-break-in-by-david-depape/#x
Yes, you are the voice of reason on this thread.
He did have a glass in his hand...cocktail, I don’t know for sure.
Whose wine? What wine? Where the hell did I dine?
That’s what I’m wondering as well, and more so given the guy’s rant above.
A glass tumbler.
They may have been maintaining positive pressure inside the house so the glass would blow outward.
Are we all going to forget that DePape was a liberal lunatic all his life?
Gin & Tonic ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.