Now the FBI can claim to be “doing something” despite no evidence of them making progress investigating recent ACTUAL ATTACKS on transformers in North Carolina, Oregon and Washington — probably by leftist environmentalists.
Oh, “extremist views” eh? Weird huh?
“ Clendaniel allegedly referenced Unabomber Ted Kaczynski and Hitler”
Clearly a crazed libtard zombie causing additional chaos
“Round up the usual suspects.”
How many Feebs were involved in their “conspiracy”?
Brandon eh?
Not sure why neo nazi ideology makes one attack power grids. Easier to see why environmental ideology might. Would expect neo nazis to attack a Jewish center or the like.
More entrapment of people though the use of informants not a serious operation against serious criminal activity.
The FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office officials in Baltimore announced they had arrested two individuals, a man and a woman, with extremist views who were allegedly attempting to attack the power grid in Maryland.
....uh oh, they showed up in a photo of the audience at a school board hearing...............
Exactly, like those poor dupes in Mi who caught snared in a total BS kidnapping plot of the rat Governor. The head of that op ran the raid on Trumps home.
Neo- nazi eh?
Like the socialists in Germany?
Or maybe Auntie Fah?
“FBI arrests man, woman . .”
I thought it was a Tranny article
Reading other articles “Neo Nazi extremists”...so they were leftists. Looking to reinstate the Nazi (National SOCIALIST workers party) planks. Which are literally the Democrat’s platform.
I actually know a Nazi according to my son who knew his kids. He’s in jail right now. Brilliant guy but he had no filter at all.
Looks like she lost the top of her head there.
I read this article earlier and thought it certainly was light on evidence of exactly what “extremist” views they had. Were they just common place “extreme” criminals who like creating chaos, or were they ANTIFA enviro-wackies who were doing it to “save the planet”?
It’s seems as if they expressed any type of conservative views in the past, that information would have been front and center of any law enforcement agency statement. “Right-wing domestic terrorists” would be featured on the front pages of NYTs and WaPo.
From my reading of this, none were actually “caught in the act” but
BSing online with each other.
Something done countless times on the internet and at any bar near closing time.
Actually crimes solved?
Still waiting for the Jan 6th DC bomber....
(Crickets)
Both these people were already in prison for something else and yet were communicating to each other by computer planning to attack these substations.
Interesting they can zoom in on so-called right wing extremists, but can’t find an Antifa- or Eco-terrorist if their lives depended on it...
Okay, let me get this straight.
They were both in jail. I’m assuming not in the same cell or floor due to their sexes, but ya never know today.
But anyways, they were in separate jails, and didn’t actually blow up or destroy anything, because they were in jail.
But they talked about it. Via, letters, email, text, but they talked.
Is that the same as doing? Is talking actionable, when one is incarcerated and not able to actually perform the act discussed?
I’m trying to see whether their lawyer can claim a first amendment right to talk about wanting to commit a crime, when the physical ability is not present.
How about 2 paraplegics? People committed to insane asylums? People who are talking trash to get attention?