Completely ridiculous.
It’s not valid to compare the risk of Natural Immunity to Vaccines, unless you include the risk of having Covid 19 to gain the Natural Immunity. The comparison should be: Covid 19 + resulting Natural Immunity vs Vaccines
That would be interesting, but if you do that you're also would need to expand the analysis into other options, such as, the risk of simply catching covid and having no specific immunity vs the risk of taking any shots. And/or the possibility of people like me who have never gotten covid, or only a version of it so mild it had no symptoms, verses the risk of taking any shots.
And even then, how can they even determine if the shots reduce your symptoms or not? That's very hard to demonstrate beyond a doubt, as well.
People might even be willing to put up with some pretty significant side effects from the shots if there was any real evidence that people who got the shot fared any better than those who didn't. Like noticeable differences, between the jabbed and unjabbed.
There's none. Therefore, you're stuck with just getting the risks of the shot, without knowing if it's even going to help much or not, and knowing that it will only be bad for you, if you never catch covid anyway.
A chat bot “came up” with that pure nonsense.
Completely ridiculous.
That's worse than ridiculous that's utterly insane. lol
Survival rate of covid w/ no vax = 99.7%
Survival rate of jumping out of a plane w/ no parachute = 0%