Posted on 03/07/2023 6:34:54 AM PST by Coronal
A judge on Monday ordered sanctions against Republican Mark Finchem, the losing candidate in Arizona’s secretary of state race who challenged the election results in court.
In granting the sanctions, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian said Finchem and his attorney, Daniel McCauley III, filed their lawsuit “without substantial justification.”
Finchem lost the election to Democrat Adrian Fontes by 120,208 votes.
Julian in December dismissed Finchem's lawsuit, which requested a new election, alleged that then-Secretary of State Katie Hobbs had engaged in misconduct and claimed that illegal votes were cast because of errors in the laboratory testing of voting machines and voting software issues.
After the dismissal, Hobbes joined Fontes in filing a motion for sanctions against Finchem and his lawyer.
Julian’s order Monday asked Fontes and Hobbs, who is now governor, to submit an application for an award of attorney’s fees and statement of costs. The order did not impose additional penalty damages.
The order said that while Arizona courts recommend that sanctions be awarded only in "rare cases" to avoid discouraging legitimate lawsuits, Finchem's election challenge was one of those rarities.
"None of Contestant Finchem’s allegations, even if true, would have changed the vote count enough to overcome the 120,000 votes he needed to affect the result of this election," Julian wrote. "The Court finds that this lawsuit was groundless and not brought in good faith." Julian noted that Finchem withdrew his request to inspect ballots, "suggesting that he had no expectation that an inspection would yield a favorable outcome." Doing so, the judge said, "demonstrates that Finchem challenged his election loss despite knowing that his claims regarding misconduct and procedural irregularities were insufficient under the law to sustain the contest."
Finchem's attorney said Finchem plans to appeal but did not provide additional comment.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
“Denier”. Alinsky
No wonder. He lost 120,000 votes. He needed significant evidence to overcome that.
So he just got a scolding from the Judge. He does not have to pay any fines or fees? Sweet!
So, you can be punished for taking LEGAL actions, now?
Is the left still claiming that Trump stole the 2016 election? I haven’t kept up.
The courts are a terrible place to overturn elections.
Unless you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that every single vote was stolen you are toast.
It is like trying to put toothpaste back in the tube—total waste of time.
AZ government is dirty. Bought. Bribed. Threatened.
If the Cartel’s eventually are directly connected (as per recent to the now Governor and several Judges, where will this wind up?
Shadygrooove @shadygrooove (Feb 23, 2023)
https://twitter.com/LibbyTard6/status/1629309615795064837
https://twitter.com/shadygrooove/status/1629003175511605249
EXPLOSIVE testimony today at the Sen. Elections and House O/sight hearings by Jackie Berger
Outlining the most complex investigation into Political corruption in AZ. @katiehobbs and her husband are laundering cartel money through fake deeds and mortgages.
@KariLake
Filing a lawsuit is legal.
Filing a frivolous lawsuit is not.
The left control everything that can punish the right. The right has very few options open to them to defend themselves with in courts of law these days
Not quite. From the story:
“Julian’s order Monday asked Fontes and Hobbs, who is now governor, to submit an application for an award of attorney’s fees and statement of costs. The order did not impose additional penalty damages.”
The rats learned in 18 & 20 that is almost impossible to get court to even delay an election “result” let alone overturn one. So once they have the SOS offices it’s game over. They took every swing state while the GOP looked on like Gomer Pyle and many actually collaborated
So he’s still on the hook.
Yes.
So he just got a scolding from the Judge. He does not have to pay any fines or fees? Sweet!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
they got the headline they wanted
complete with 3rd party judicial validation
We are not going to get any “redresses to our grievances” through the courts.
The Democrats even pull these stunts against each other.
This primary challenger in this local election had rock solid proof of fraud—enough to overturn the election—and at the end of the day the courts still supported the party establishment.
Here is one article that gives the basic facts of the case.
https://ctmirror.org/2019/09/23/records-subpoenaed-in-bridgeport-mayoral-primary/
Btw—notice that when Democrats challenge elections they are not “election deniers”.
That title is reserved for Republican challengers.
Another FR posting from a left wing source.
Sooo happy to generate click revenue for NBC. Why?
Arizona, the future Oregon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.