Given that narrowly scoped scenario? Probably not. Bur your supposition was not the reality of the situation.
That was not a viable scenario, based on reports.
So, my observation stands. You cannot conflate the two situations.
Given the fact that once the shooter at Uvalde was engaged by an armed policeman, his carnage was stopped, shows that my position is actually based upon the reality of the situation.
If the officer had performed that service earlier, it would have resulted in less bodies. Why did the officer stop the shooter? To stop the shooter from killing more children. Ergo, a faster engagement by cops reduces the number of those killed.
Your position is unreasonable given all the facts, so I have to assume you are a Uvalde police officer or related to one of them who failed to act as those children were slaughtered.