Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salman

Before mass media hypersexualized everything and modern grooming and hygeine made being in proximity to another human body appealing, sex was not as interesting a proposition as it can be nowadays. Further, homosexual sex had a much greater social stigma back then, it wasn’t like there was an easy way for a man to elicit a sex act from another man without a whole lot of risk. And that is before you stick everyone together in a crowded muddy trench and subject them to artillery fire.

This guy is just wishcasting.


8 posted on 04/04/2023 5:16:54 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jz638

Sheesh, Thomas Jefferson owned slaves. Of course he wasn’t gay!


9 posted on 04/04/2023 5:17:46 AM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jz638

Well put

I remember when the phrase “rolling queers” was still a common and somewhat publicly acceptable thing that you’d commonly hear (not condoning it) and knowing what my dad and uncles attitudes were about homosexuality and such as WW2 veterans I don’t but that line of bs for a minute.

Sure there was likely some acts quietly and secretly but someone claiming anything like gender fluid would almost certainly been mocked incessantly or killed


14 posted on 04/04/2023 5:47:45 AM PDT by Manuel OKelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jz638

Correct; because to him it “seems” unlikely, it must be true!


22 posted on 04/04/2023 6:13:57 AM PDT by drwoof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson