Is this a basis for shareholders to sue the management?
Is this a basis for shareholders to sue the management?
The ONLY thing that will make Americans revolt is if you shoot their dogs. Other than that, forget it. They love the abuse.
BLM has proven to be NOTHING MORE than a GIANT SHAKEDOWN
No matter how much is given away, in about 10 years the money will all come back and the recipients will not have it anymore. That is why they give it away. They know it will come back to them in some form or another.
What say you, shareholders?
"In the Wake of Bank Collapses, Biden Prepares to Seize Control of All U.S. Dollars"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
In my opinion, Biden being alleged to be preparing to seize control of US dollars is probably part of the plan of a government-manufactured crisis, the following thread a clue about this manufactured crisis.
U.S. Corporations Cut Dividends And Employees While Dumping Billions Into Race-Hustling Groups (4.12.23)
It is important to note that the drafters of the Constitution had decided not only to NOT give the federal government the specific power to regulate INTRAstate banking but had also expressly constitutionally limited the states to using only gold and silver coins as legal tender.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 5: To coin Money [emphasis added], regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;"
"Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts [emphases added]; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."
"It is known that the very power now proposed as a means was rejected as an end by the Convention which formed the Constitution. A proposition was made to them to authorize Congress to open canals, and an amendatory one to empower them to incorporate. But the whole was rejected, and one of the reasons for rejection urged in debate was, that then they would have a power to erect a bank, which would render the great cities, where there were prejudices and jealousies on the subject, adverse to the reception of the Constitution [emphasis added]. — Jefferson's Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791
Note that Justice Joseph Story had indicated that drafters of Constitution were aware of post-American Revolution problems with regulating value of paper money which is why drafters limited currency to gold and silver coin.
In other words, paper money effectively nullifies the fed's power to regulate value of money.
"It has been justly remarked, that the power "to coin money" would, doubtless, include that of regulating its value [emphasis added], had the latter power not been expressly inserted. But the constitution abounds with pleonasms and repetitions of this nature."—Joseph Story, Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 4 and 5, Commentaries on the Constitution 2:§§ 732--33, 735--39
"It is further to be observed, that the states cannot issue bills of credit; not that they cannot make them a legal tender; but that they cannot issue them at all. This is a clear indication of the intent of the constitution to restrain the states, as well from establishing a paper circulation, as from interfering with the metallic circulation [emphases added]."—Joseph Story, Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 4 and 5, Commentaries on the Constitution 2:§§ 732--33, 735--39
The reason that we're not using strictly gold and silver coins anymore is that Constitution-ignoring FDR wrongly ignored first leading Congress to successfully petition the states for appropriate constitutional amendment to repeal Congress's unique power to regulate value of money before he signed constitutionally indefensible executive order to confiscate gold.
Executive Order 6102
In fact, President Woodrow Wilson also wrongly ignored first leading Congress to successfully petition the states to amend the Constitution to give power to regulate value of money to constitutionally undefined Federal Reserve (Reserve) before he signed bill that established the Reserve.
In fact, since ordinary qualified citizen voters still have the power to indirectly "regulate" the value of money by electing representatives who still uniquely have the power to do so, the establishment of the Reserve wrongly weakened citizen voting power imo.
Are we having fun yet? 8^P
It's as if Democrats and RINOs have studied the ideas that constitutional lawmakers had rejected and are now implementing the ideas as policy to try destroy the constitutional republic.
p