Skip to comments.
Luxury lingerie brand ‘by women, for women’ posts new ad with biological male in women’s bra and panties
Fox News ^
| 4/14/23
| Gabriel Hays
Posted on 04/14/2023 1:37:14 PM PDT by CFW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Almost every corporation has jumped on this trans-bandwagon. You can tell they are being extorted to do so. Given the push-back and loss of market share by AB, there is no way any corporation would voluntarily jump into the fray at this time.
What women wants to put on lingerie while at the same time picturing a man wearing the same? "Eeewwww! How gross!" Would be my first thought. I know I can't be the only woman to feel that way.
1
posted on
04/14/2023 1:37:14 PM PDT
by
CFW
To: CFW
So, is he proud to be a country transvestite?
To: CFW
This company also thinks women are so important they can easily be replaced by a man
3
posted on
04/14/2023 1:38:56 PM PDT
by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
To: CFW
Din’t need a biologist for all that...
4
posted on
04/14/2023 1:39:30 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: CFW
So, this company would rather appeal to less than one percent of the population while telling their female customers to “get used to it because we will not listen to your complaints”.
5
posted on
04/14/2023 1:40:22 PM PDT
by
CFW
(old and retired)
To: CFW
I have a different theory. I believe they’re being paid to do it knowing the kick back from the public will be fierce. This, in turn, will collapse critical portions of the market. It’s controlled demolition.
6
posted on
04/14/2023 1:41:05 PM PDT
by
rarestia
(“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” -Hamilton)
To: CFW
I ain’t looking at the pictures but where did it stash his unit?
To: CFW
Marketing their products to 51% of the population was considered “really stupid” by a special focus group. Targeting a select group of less than 1% of the population was considered “bold and innovative”.
8
posted on
04/14/2023 1:43:26 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(“You want it one way, but it's the other way”)
To: CFW
9
posted on
04/14/2023 1:44:13 PM PDT
by
mylife
(I was a sort of country boy, a cockeyed optimist, wrapped in international intrigue and espionage)
To: CFW
Victoria’s Secret had big gals
Awhile back...
I thought they may Have gone
FULL RETARD.
Still the shine is off Their glimmer.
To: CFW
Not sure why women put up with men usurping their femininity.
I imagine the men will eventually go a bridge too far on this and then the women will have to step in and put a stop to the nonsense.
11
posted on
04/14/2023 1:46:08 PM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(5,016,040 Truth | 87,429,920 Twitter)
To: rarestia
My thoughts Also.
.
In addition it also
Demoralizes a society.
To: CFW
......”Almost every corporation has jumped on this trans-bandwagon”.......
All the companies are out to make money on whatever is ‘trending’ They did the same thing during covid lockdown....
13
posted on
04/14/2023 1:47:24 PM PDT
by
caww
(O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......)
To: ClearCase_guy
I also suspect someone is paying them large sums (investing in their company) of money to help make up any losses from reduced product sales.
14
posted on
04/14/2023 1:48:20 PM PDT
by
CFW
(old and retired)
To: CFW
I work for a company that services the retail industry. One of our customers was V... er, a large lingerie chain. The girls told me that men frequently came in to try on the merchandize. I don’t know if it was the law, or company policy, but they weren’t allowed to stop it.
15
posted on
04/14/2023 1:49:30 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: CFW
The liberal War on Women continues.
16
posted on
04/14/2023 1:49:36 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(No Arm up! They have!)
To: Big Red Badger
Yep. They’re using these as distractions from criminal activity by the leftists. Americans are falling it for it every time.
17
posted on
04/14/2023 1:52:33 PM PDT
by
rarestia
(“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” -Hamilton)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Not many years ago, they were called "Female Impersonators." We need to bring back that name.
18
posted on
04/14/2023 1:55:56 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone els)
To: Big Red Badger
Victoria’s Secret had big gals awhile back. That was different. That was Victoria Secret trying to enlarge there customer base.
19
posted on
04/14/2023 1:57:38 PM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: CFW
WTH is WRONG with people today?????????????????????
20
posted on
04/14/2023 1:57:42 PM PDT
by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson