What needs to be reversed is Wickard v Filburn.
If you wish to inform us, then why don’t you explain?!
“What needs to be reversed is Wickard v Filburn.”
Then Miller.
L
Wickard is also a patent sophistry for conflating potential interstate commerce with actual interstate commerce. It's like arguing a potential murder is an actual murder.
If they rule correctly, a step in that direction!
Agree, and that should happen immediately after the Chevron doctrine is overturned.
I'm no legal eagle by any stretch, it appears (to me) that the Supreme Court has finally woken up to federal agency overreach and Congress not doing its job.
Federal Agency over-reach & bureaucratic "rule" is a huge part of the deep state that Legit President Trump rails against.
I support overturning the Chevron doctrine, follwed by Wickard v. Filburn and then Miller.
BTW: I don't give a damn' what kind of chaos overturning the three does. Can't be any worse than what we have now. Can only be better!
LET MY PEOPLE GO!
Agreed!
“What needs to be reversed is Wickard v Filburn.”
Amen to that.
From your keyboard to God’s inbox!
That stupid decision needs to go.
I’m an attorney, and when we read Wickard v. Filburn in law school, I honestly thought it was the worst decision I had ever seen. It’s absolutely ridiculous and needs to go.
“What needs to be reversed is Wickard v Filburn.”
—————
Agreed…then the NFA and GCA. “…shall not be infringed “
Roosevelt wanted to pack SCOTUS by forced retirements and changing the number of justices. Members of his own party said what Roosevelt wanted was "more power than a good man should want, or a bad man should have."
NO ONE can tell me the cheat was not in...In that election
The trick, as always, is finding a way to get the issue in front of the Court.