[where's_the_Outrage?]

The author definitely went stupid with mentioning deference to bureaucrats on the environment.

[JonPreston]

Thant god we have Smilin’ John Roberts guiding the Supreme Court ship.

[grobdriver]

room for some level of deference to bureaucrats on deeply technical matters, especially on matters of health and the environment.

You're right there.

There is very little about environmental laws that is technical - it's mostly based on emotion, conjecture and fantasy.

They like to pretend it's science, but let science discover a fact that upends their world, and all hell breaks loose.

[mick]

That’s a ridiculous criticism. Did you understand the argument?
The author made it clear in the whole piece that such a potential deference would only be a very limited exception.
This was an excellent explanation of why our federal behemoth is out of control and what SCOTUS can do to rectify it.

[sauropod]

.

[lurk]

The Roberts court usually makes micro adjustments rather than sweeping change. There are exceptions.

[Cen-Tejas]

This Loper case, in a sane world, is a no brainer. Bureaucrats should not be making law. Period.

Over decades, legislators just got lazier and lazier and just settled into “let the agency make the rules, I’m busy”. Predictably, for bureaucrats, they abused their power.

[libertylover]

The doctrine requires courts to defer in those ambiguous instances to government agencies and allow the bureaucracy to interpret the statute so long as the interpretation is “reasonable.”.....

What could go wrong?

[kvanbrunt2]

Presidential Candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has stated his intention to use the courts to dismantle many of the admin state. Want to get rid of several agencies. Reduce the Fed by 90%.