“That’s a ridiculous criticism. Did you understand the argument?”
So you are OK with unelected officials continuing to control waterways (including a farm pond), increasing regulations on fossil fuels to force so called clean energy, etc.
And I should have included letting them continue to control heath as stupid. Just look at this whole COVID scam, and now pushing gender reassignment on minors.
I stand by what I wrote.
YOU WROTE:”So you are OK with unelected officials continuing to control waterways (including a farm pond), increasing regulations on fossil fuels to force so called clean energy, etc.”
Calm down, buddy. Where did I say I was ok with that crap?
Maybe you should try t understand the English language before going on a mindless tirade.
“Limited exceptions” means exactly what it says. In any judicial ruling having to do with such matters the court must allow for such things.
It was valid criticism but left out the deference to health “experts”. We’ve seen during the covid issue just how political and not technical the experts are. Fauci, Briks the CDC etc were not following science but political policy. So there should be no deference to the administrative state.