[Go Gordon]

“Rice is to blame for around 10% of global emissions of methane, a gas that over two decades, traps about 80 times as much heat as carbon dioxide,” intones the AP. “Scientists say that if the world wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, rice cannot be ignored.””

Sure it does, methane makes up 17/100,000ths of one percent of the atmosphere. Reductions in rice and cow farts is not going to change a damn thing. Junk science beyond the pale.

[CFW]

“Sure it does, methane makes up 17/100,000ths of one percent of the atmosphere. Reductions in rice and cow farts is not going to change a damn thing. Junk science beyond the pale.”

---

That is junk science which needs to be called out, discounted, and sent to the landfill to be destroyed. This is the type of research and science that is the result of the D.I.E. promotions. We no long have hiring in institutions based upon merit, knowledge, and experience, but instead based upon which boxes a person can check. Therefore, any resulting research result will be tainted and therefore unreliable.

[muir_redwoods]

“ Sure it does, methane makes up 17/100,000ths of one percent of the atmosphere. Reductions in rice and cow farts is not going to change a damn thing. Junk science beyond the pale. ”

One of these knuckleheads needs to explain how 60 million pre-Columbia’s bison didn’t cause global warming but 30 million beef and dairy cattle do today