Skip to comments.
How the U.S. wants to pressure China to help avert climate catastrophe
The Washington Post via MSN ^
| May 30, 2023
| by Michael Birnbaum, Christian Shepherd
Posted on 05/30/2023 4:17:39 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
2
posted on
05/30/2023 4:19:31 AM PDT
by
Fai Mao
(Starve the beast and steal its food!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Now it’s a “catastrophe”. What’ll it be next? I can hardly wait. They’re running out of verbiage.
3
posted on
05/30/2023 4:23:55 AM PDT
by
albie
To: Oldeconomybuyer
4
posted on
05/30/2023 4:27:40 AM PDT
by
2banana
(Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“de-risking, not decoupling.” This is all about defrauding.
5
posted on
05/30/2023 4:28:40 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(“You want it one way, but it's the other way”)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bull shit........ Biden is just seeking a headline and the appearance of doing something
6
posted on
05/30/2023 4:28:59 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
7
posted on
05/30/2023 4:29:30 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
("Life without liberty is like a body without spirit." - Kahlil Gibran)
To: ClearCase_guy
8
posted on
05/30/2023 4:31:01 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Perhaps it would be wise to focus on the American people instead of wasting time, money and resources on every eff’n country other than the United States. That applies with climate change and just about every other issue.
9
posted on
05/30/2023 4:32:07 AM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
("How did you go bankrupt?s" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Sign an agreement that both sides immediately ignore.
10
posted on
05/30/2023 4:32:29 AM PDT
by
Leep
(What skill or service did the biden family have that netted them tens of millions of dollars?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Pull the other one WaPo.
11
posted on
05/30/2023 4:33:25 AM PDT
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(You can't tell where we're going if you don't know where we've been)
To: ConservativeInPA
The critical cities are self destructing.
That’s good and must be allowed, even assisted. For America to be America, the cities as they now exist must be destroyed.
So, the way to assist is to let them continue to rot
12
posted on
05/30/2023 4:37:03 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
LOL! Good luck with that.
The Chinese are far too practical to cut their own throats by sacrificing to Gaia.
13
posted on
05/30/2023 4:37:24 AM PDT
by
FLT-bird
To: Oldeconomybuyer
China will pretend to cooperate. They will smile, and agree to certain points, in theory. And they might even set a few far-off goals.
This will cause great celebration in the West. But of course nothing will change.
Here’s the scary part. Biden and the West will have to give up something in return for China’s “cooperation”. I shudder to think what that could be.
14
posted on
05/30/2023 4:41:04 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
China has more new coal plants in the pipeline than we have in production. We can’t control the climate anyway, but the fact that they think they’re going to keep the boat from sinking while China deliberately keeps shooting holes in the hull tells you how much they’ve gamed this out.
I think we need to have a liberal activist draft to launch a holy war land invasion of China mainland to take out all of their coal plants. The casualties will be enormous, but everybody wins.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
16
posted on
05/30/2023 4:47:29 AM PDT
by
gitmo
(If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Biden administration is searching for ways to push [emphasis mine] the world’s largest polluter to reduce carbon emissions, as superpower rivalries engulf a fragile bilateral relationship that could determine the future of global warming.Yeah, right. China sure got their money's worth when they bought China Joe.
17
posted on
05/30/2023 4:51:12 AM PDT
by
nuke_road_warrior
(Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Neither China nor India could care less about the West’s ludicrous climate charade. They will play the game as it suits their needs, but meanwhile go their own way to a prosperous “carbon” future.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
CO2 is not a pollutant.
19
posted on
05/30/2023 4:57:39 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: ConservativeInPA
Climate change? How do you focus on a hoax?
20
posted on
05/30/2023 4:58:23 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson