EMBEDDED LINKS AT SITE......................
To: Red Badger
To: Red Badger
lack of informed consent Of course. Under the COVID situation, informed consent was impossible. They withheld the data and wanted it sealed for 75 years.
3 posted on
05/31/2023 6:16:22 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(“You want it one way, but it's the other way”)
To: Red Badger
many “medical” journals like NEJM did not
publish good papers, and removed them from access.
They should be bankrupted, sued, and along with their
Editors TRIED FOR TREASON AND GENOCIDE.
4 posted on
05/31/2023 6:21:20 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Red Badger
It would be nice if the scientific community would also start reevaluating all those phony climate change alarmist papers.
5 posted on
05/31/2023 6:21:39 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: Red Badger
I suspect many of the papers are the ones the media relied on to tell us to wear masks, stay 6 feet apart, and not to take horse-paste. Now that they have outlived their usefulness its time for the papers to be retracted.
6 posted on
05/31/2023 6:24:24 AM PDT by
CFW
(old and retired)
To: Red Badger
Shades of Emily Litella...
8 posted on
05/31/2023 6:34:51 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
To: Red Badger
PULL ALL FUNDING FROM EVERY ORGANIZATION THAT LET THIS FRAUD PROCEED!
10 posted on
05/31/2023 7:25:57 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(The Democrat Party - Dumbing Down America Since 1965.)
To: Red Badger
What’s 330 as a percentage of total studies? Also, what was the reach (how many people and doctors read them)?
11 posted on
05/31/2023 7:49:57 AM PDT by
LucienCA13
(sorry if you are microaggrieved)
To: Red Badger
Pulling these papers now, only after the “plandemic” is functionally over, is incredibly disingenuous. As already noted, how much public policy was informed by these papers? What would have been different if the problems with these papers had been acknowledged sooner, and how badly damaged would “the message” have been?
To: Red Badger
13 posted on
05/31/2023 8:57:44 AM PDT by
sauropod
(“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
To: Red Badger
Sounds like they retracted mostly Papers that were critical of, or in contradiction to the official covid stance.
14 posted on
05/31/2023 2:51:31 PM PDT by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson