Buttigieg says Supreme Court case was designed for ‘clear purpose of chipping away’ at LGBTQ equality (Pro Christian Ruling)

Channel 3000 News/CNN ^ | July 3, 2023 | CNN Staff

[Old Grumpy]

>>> “for the clear purpose of chipping away” at LGBTQ equality.<<<

LGBTQ Equality. What a farce. I would LOVE to have as much “EQUALITY” at those people. They have WAY MORE EQUALITY and RIGHTS than the rest of us do.

[Karliner]

There’s no moral law that says homosexuality is wholesome or good for society.

They have freedoms but stop pushing your shit.

[Eleutheria5]

You’re not equal unless you can force a man to design gay wedding cakes for you, and also bankrupt him resisting this demand. The horror!

[simpson96]

...and Liberals would NEVER do something “by design”, would they, Incompetent Pete?

That’s pretty much all they do.

[Wuli]

Translation: Buttigieg is really not in favor of freedom of speech or religious freedom. While he takes a position as if he is not protected from “bigots” we take the position that those he opposes have gained some protection from his bigotry.

[chopperk]

Pete spends more time trying to be a good wife than Sec’y of Transportation. He fits right in with the Biden Crime Family.

[ronnie raygun]

These fn mentally ill gays cannot talk about anything else but thier issue

[pburgh01]

Really have no issue with the LGB part of LGBTQ+ASJLKSSLLSSS. Most are sane, tax-paying, rational Americans. The rest of the alphabet has a diagnosable metal illness and should be medicated and institutionalized. The ones preying on children with this demonic doctrine should be exterminated with extreme prejudice. Like diseased vermin they are

[nagant]

Because homosexual graphic artists are forced to design websites for straight weddings.

Wait. That’s not correct.

[Lisbon1940]

You don’t have to be approached.

[reg45]

As to the Supreme Court’s decision, the same ruling would apply in a converse case. What if a gay web site developer had been asked to create a Biblical web site?

[Political Junkie Too]

Only the left is allowed to target bakers, florists, and photographers to "design" Supreme Court cases that "chip away" at traditional values.

-PJ

[StAnDeliver]

"Smith said in court filings that a man had inquired about her services for his same-sex wedding. But as CNN previously reported, the man in question says that he never reached out to Smith – and that he’s straight and married to a woman."

First of all, that jackass is never mentioned in SCOTUS' 303 Creative, and it is very, very telling that Buttgag was given the dumbest possible set of talking points to regurgitate. Frankly The White Hospice handlers assigned to Butttag, are fully intent on sawing him off at the knees.

"Lorie Smith wants to expand her graphic design business, 303 Creative LLC, to include services for couples seeking wedding websites. But Ms. Smith worries that Colorado will use the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act to compel her—in violation of the First Amendment—to create websites celebrating marriages she does not endorse. To clarify her rights, Ms. Smith filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction to preventthe State from forcing her to create websites celebrating marriages that defy her belief that marriage should be reserved to unions between one man and one woman."

That's right out of the decision. Even the 10th Circuit said she had standing, and standing to do what?

Punch. the. everlasting. f. down. on. CADA.

These lame Rocky Mountain marxists didn't take the f'ing hint in SCOTUS' Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and so those Justices have finally found a spine and issued 303 Creative as a cease-and-desist to CADA and Colorado.

From this day forward, if CADA takes any punitive action against any business that asserts Constitution protections under 1A, these Mile-High Kommissars must be held in contempt of SCOTUS and punished with jail time, and the Kommission permanently dissolved.

[CatOwner]

If only this were true. Far too many Americans want things peaceful, even it if means capitulating to an ideology they firmly disagree with (Islam immediately comes to mind).

[Ancesthntr]

Well, who is it exactly who walked into the bake shop? That says all that I need to know about who was trying to set up a court case.

As usual, Comrade Buttplug is a lying sack of $hit.

[JJBookman]

Hey Buttplug, there is NO right for sodomy.