To: Oldeconomybuyer
Those qualifying had to be at least 18 and living in the city between 1919 and 1969 Dimm math at work here. The youngest that anyone who lived between these years can be is 53 or 54 years old. Was the "at least 18" necessary?
9 posted on
07/11/2023 1:04:23 PM PDT by
NohSpinZone
(First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
To: NohSpinZone
Dimm math at work here. The youngest that anyone who lived between these years can be is 53 or 54 years old. Was the "at least 18" necessary? Perhaps they're justifying it on segregation. A slippery slope. I thought it was supposedly about slavery.
19 posted on
07/11/2023 1:16:14 PM PDT by
Tell It Right
(1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: NohSpinZone
The youngest that anyone who lived between these years can be is 53 or 54 years old. Was the “at least 18” necessary?
I read it and my math comes out differently. The youngest person to qualify had to be at least 18, that is a legal adult, in 1969, therefore born in 1951. So that would make the youngest 72 or so. How to prove you were living in Evanston in 1969 might be a bit tricky.
28 posted on
07/11/2023 1:35:43 PM PDT by
hanamizu
To: NohSpinZone
If they had to be at least 18 in 1969, they’d be no younger than 72 now....
39 posted on
07/11/2023 2:34:48 PM PDT by
G Larry
(It is RACIST to impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants by importing Cheap ILLEGAL Labor!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson