Posted on 07/12/2023 7:59:31 AM PDT by Red Badger
For some odd reason, a certain contingent of the population is trying to downplay how serious of a problem child sex trafficking has become.
This is evident by the fact that many leftists have reacted negatively to Jim Caviezel’s new movie “Sound of Freedom.”
The movie seems to have rattled many of them in a major way, which begs a serious question:
Why?
Why would anyone have a problem with Jim Caviezel bringing attention to something like this?
We can only speculate on the answer to that question of course.
However, here’s another question…
Why did the DOJ suddenly remove three sections from their areas of concern on their website on Child Sex Trafficking?
“International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” were removed from the website on May 12, 2023.
The Gateway Pundit tackled this very question:
Why did the DOJ remove “International Sex Trafficking of Minors”, “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” from the Department of Justice website under Child Sex Trafficking?
The Biden administration removed these sections on May 12, 2023.
Why would they remove these important sections?
Some Twitter users provided screenshots:
SEE TWEETS AT LINK..............
Natalie Winters discussed this with Tim Pool:
VIDEO AT LINK...............
Again I ask, why?
Who are the “they” that delayed to release of Sound of Freedom for 5 years?
From Wiki:
Distribution
The film was completed in 2018 and a distribution deal was made with 20th Century Fox. However, that studio was purchased by the Walt Disney Company, which shelved the film. The filmmakers reportedly spent years trying to get the distribution rights back from Disney and take it to theaters.[14]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_of_Freedom_(film)
As Bart Simpson would say, that is a odd thing to do.
They were also rattled by the accusation of grooming. Which was also true.
Fed gov = All politics all the time.
The entire alphabet demographic is founded on pedophilia.
Beltway sized Pizzs-Gate.
WTH???
Um, does anyone do basic research anymore?
100% Fed Up is 100% wrong.
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/child-sex-trafficking
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/extraterritorial-sexual-exploitation-children
It’s getting harder than ever to deny that the Democrat Party is being run by Satan.
It’s the only conclusion that makes sense.
[[Why? Why would anyone have a problem with Jim Caviezel bringing attention to something like this?]]
Because slaves of Satan wither and wail and gnash their teeth whenever light exposes their evil. Th3y can’t help it- their evil reacts violently and involuntarily to the light.
Democrat scum plan to legalize pedophilia.
Democrats butcher babies; mutilate and rap children.
It’s just more fuel on the fire for controlling the border.
Imagine if this had come out before the 2020 election...
Beyond horrified that our country is a pedo/blood farming satanic cult. It’s no wonder there are hardly any decent politicians fighting the good fight. They have blood on their hands.
Porn has decimated this country and turned it into the satanic freak show that it is today.
What the heck is going on here? This and also the evil California Assembly not allowing a child trafficking law for a full vote. When did punishing child traffickers become such a controversial issue?
Must-watch interview with Jim Caviezal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTBGNEliczc&ab_channel=JordanBPeterson
All they need is a dem majority on the Supreme Court and suddenly raping children is not a big deal....
A line has got to be drawn here. This is insanity.
Well done. Fair is fair.
Although at first glance I thought your second link brought me to the DOJ page for “Extraterrestrial Exploitation of Children”.
Too soon?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.