Posted on 08/01/2023 6:38:40 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
No, we would all lose.
“Remember this next time dims try to move against the Second Amendment.”
If one deprived unarmed homeowner dies the whole state legislature and the governor are legally subject to execution.
And if they are of the State of New York, any statute of limitation may be waived.
“Little Jackie Smith. America’s own Inspector Clouseau.”
Beria reincarnated.
Dont equate country with government.
Re: 62 - knock off the talk about execution like that on FR. You’ll get the site into trouble.
>You know... I noticed the same thing. He looked scared or nervous. Kinda odd.
I think even he’s not on board with these charges but with the Florida documents one faltering, there’s really no reason to be the patsy when SCOTUS slaps him down again. I honestly think the case is so antithetical to the constitution that Chutkan will find a way to spike it.
Reference 65... don’t worry. He thinks he still gives orders, like he did back on active duty. LOL
The United States federal government needs the death penalty.
“Good test for DeSantis - let’s see if a potential Death Penalty against Trump bothers him.”
WTFreak
This story has nothing at all to do with DeSantis. Your RDDS is showing. Some of you guys are ever bit as bad as the Bidenites who make everything about Trump.
Isn’t that something? Nothing happens to the guy who killed a woman in cold blood while the guy who called for a peaceful protest - Trump - faces the death penalty. This government is as effed up as it gets and Republicans can absolutely go to hell for allowing this crap to continue.
Secret Service has already weighed in - they would send agents in to continue to provide protection to Trump (against assassins and whatnot) from inside prison.
To the left, it’s now conspiracy to consult an attorney in furtherance of any effort the left does not agree with.
I feel like I’m in a nightmare.
Thanks SoCon, and I only commented on this because DeSantis has already piled-on regarding this indictment for this FBI-led riot.
I just got a PM about my post 2 from someone who didn’t know it was a joke and thought that it was a serious post about Nixon’s reason for not challenging the 1960 election.
In case there are others thinking it was a serious post, it wasn’t, I thought the article headline made the wise crack about the 1960 election and Nixon an obvious chuckle-worthy joke.
RE: No wonder Nixon didn’t challenge the 1960 election.
In one interview many years later Nixon was asked if the crucial Illinois ballots counted in Mayor Daley’s Chicago that somehow went against him with information from people that boxes of GOP area ballots were dumped into the river should have caused him to protest the ballot count and thus win the country.
He said “I can’t feel sorry for what happened. I lost. Had I won it might have turned out I would have been the one assassinated.”
That gives sidesplitting laughter to the Dems when they hear it.
I’m kinda thick as the brits would say, and EVEN I picked up on that joke.
Closing off the losing side (ours) to all rights and opportunities will only build up a scorching heat of resentment.
Not that I agree with every golden word he spoke but this one quote was right——
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
-—John F. Kennedy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.