If you were paying attention to the video of elections officials counting these ballots, you saw one goon at a computer clicking "next" without scrolling down to compare the signature to the one on file. And one goon did this with hundreds of thousands of ballots. This is unconstitutional because you have two different standards. Someone who shows up to vote in person has to provide ID, but signature verification for the cheat-by-mail-ins does not exist.
If SCOTUS does not act before 2024, then we're once again going to see the republican in the lead on election night only to have the count slow-walked a week with the mail-ins putting the Democrat ahead.
Republican-controlled state legislatures could have put a stop to cheat-by-mail-in ballots in 2020, but we all know why they did not. They were happy for Dems to use them to cheat Trump. In 2022 they were happy for Dems to use them to defeat MAGA candidates. As long as the state legislatures are infected with RINOs, the only relief possible before 2024 is with SCOTUS.
You’re going to keep waiting.
There’s no case I know of making its way to the Supreme Court in time for such a judgment.
In any event, civil rights law doesn’t work to the extent that a person who is burdened can demand that an unburdened person be burdened. It DOES permit a burdened person be relieved of that burden to stand equally with the other person who is unburdened. In other words, a voter required to present ID to vote in person can’t sue to require ID be presented by vote-by-mail people, but can sue so that he no longer has to present ID either.
(As it happens, in the large majority of states, there’s no requirement to present ID to vote in person.)