this corrupt regime does not concern itself with the rule of law
you might as well ask the mafia to play by the rules
I’m wondering if going to a Special Counsel will allow for a change of venue, away from the court that rejected the plea deal. Biden’s lapdog AG Merrick Garland should be impeached for Obstruction of Justice, even before Biden.
It’s what tyrannical governments do.
Merrick needs to recuse himself. He works for Jo Jo the clown. How can he appoint the clown who is supposed to put Hunter in prison? Look at how wonderful the RATSPutin Smith thing worked out. Merrick works for Biden and his pal Smitty is trying to put Bidenskyyyy’s political opponent in prison. Like all of the Feral “courts”, the Attorney General sh*t just doesn’t work anymore. Too corrupt.
Using democrat logic I’m going to get a coyote to guard my chickens
agree
Biden and all his cabinet members should be impeached and removed. All have violated the Constitution and/or failed to uphold the duties of their elected or appointed position. Garland, Mayorkis, Wray, Granholm, etc are all either corrupt, inept, or both.
Harris should be removed based upon her cackle and obsession with Venn diagrams and yellow electric school buses alone.
Same for Jack Smith.
Can Trump sue the DOJ and get Smith removed?
Who, other than a Biden, would have standing to sue to remove Weiss?
Are these “laws” or just squishy guidelines?
Defensive lawfare.
Apparently that provision is not considered a deterrent to appointing special counsels. John Durham’s appointment for an example.
https://www.justice.gov/d9/fieldable-panel-panes/basic-panes/attachments/2021/02/26/durham.order_.pdf
Regulations are for others.
In a fascist system, no regulations apply to fascists.
The fact that Weiss colluded with Hunter's defense counsel to pull one over on the judge to sneak in a permanent, laminated, pera-plaque Get Out of Jail Free Card for Hunter for the crest of his nature life should invalidate Weiss from a y consideration as Special Counsel by the very definition above (emphasis added).
Where is the scoping letter for Weiss? What does Garland want Weiss to do, and what are the third-rail topics Weiss is not to touch...?....other than to look the other way regarding the Biden Family Crime Syndicate.
They don’t have very many people to choose from to be a Biden special counsel. Hunter don’t have that many friends.
If there is any doubt about this, just consider the oddness of garland’s presser.
He was stiff like a robot, spoke his piece, and then abruptly departed, without questions.
That was a schmuck being forced to be there, knowing how guilty he is.
They know it.
So?
They seem to make up laws and regulations when needed and ignore laws and regulations when possible.
Why let a little ole DOJ regulation stand in the way?
We used to be a nation of laws, but that ‘social contract’ was broken by the leftist infiltrators in high offices.
Nevermind DOJ policies.
It VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW!!!!
This is the Federal Law, not some DOJ policy:
28 CFR § 600.3
Ҥ 600.3 Qualifications of the Special Counsel.
(a) An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government. Special Counsels shall agree that their responsibilities as Special Counsel shall take first precedence in their professional lives, and that it may be necessary to devote their full time to the investigation, depending on its complexity and the stage of the investigation.
(b) The Attorney General shall consult with the Assistant Attorney General for Administration to ensure an appropriate method of appointment, and to ensure...”
“The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government.”
Not, “May be,” as the talkingpoints say.
“SHALL BE.”
Supreme Court already ruled “Shall be” means MANDATORY.
GARLAND BROKE THE LAW!!!
28 CFR § 600.3
“.....lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making,....”
Isn’t that a little oxymoronic?
Make the opposition play by their own rules.
David Weiss CANNOT be appointed to the position so long as he cannot represent both sides of the investigation, but must be completely OUTSIDE the purview of the Department of Justice, or Just-Us, ort Injustice, or whatever
As a disinterested party, I would suggest Jonathan Turley. Even though he is a known liberal, he respects the Constitution and the rule of law in a way few other liberals or “progressives” now do.
And Garland and Biden both think there is not a single thing that can interfere with it.
Now is the time for in the street protests against Weiss and Garland....go after them and their friends at restaurants, protest at their homes,bang drums all night long ,sh*t on their lawns etc.