Perot was the best of the three.
No Labels was a construct of the Starbucks CEO, Schwartz, IIRC.
Then, when it failed, he went right back to the demoKKKrat party. So, that’s all you need to know.
The real problem a third party candidate brings is that Dems can’t handle voter fraud easily with one.
A third option would be fine if we had ranked choice voting. You could vote for the third option if you want knowing that if no one got over 50% your vote could end up with your second choice
Once again scheming to limit ballot access “to preserve democracy”.
Teddy Roosevelt when denied the GOP nomination ran as the Bull Moose candidate and that through the electoral college victory to - Woodrow Wilson.
Perot ran and we got Bill Clinton.
Oh God, you said the P word.
And sure enough - morons have come out of the closet to defend voting for this clown.
Thanks Morons. For 8 years of Clinton.
When Perot dropped out Clinton’s numbers went up, Bush’s stayed the same.
Meanwhile here we are with two parties that stand for nothing, only combine for 60% of registered voters, regularly score around 50% combined in the approval polls, and yet hold 99.9% of elected offices. We need 3rd parties bad. There needs to be other voices. Maybe even people that believe in something other than getting re-elected.
Democratic, democracy, nothing we do in this country. We have a republican form of government.
That could backfire. “dangerous” is a racey word. It’s an attention getter. You could be giving them free attention with your ‘dark money’
Indeed to many stuck on the party and not who is best for the job.
Trump is the perfect example he found out how much the democrat party sucked went republican and not much a fan of them only option he had for a chance of the job.
He proved his worth
I voted for Perot - twice - and I’m proud that I did.
Third partiers are delusional narcissists