Posted on 09/06/2023 8:42:14 PM PDT by lightman
Public health officials’ efforts to protect citizens from COVID-19 infection and avert death may have backfired, a new study published in Health Economics suggests. What’s more, the efforts could be linked to excess deaths.
Mandatory masking and social distancing became everyday directives for millions worldwide when the COVID-19 virus exploded onto the scene in 2020. Shelter-in-place (SIP) or stay-at-home orders quickly followed despite evidence supporting the protocol remaining mixed.
Now, a cross-collaborative team of scientists from California, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts is expressing confidence based on results from rigorous research examining whether stay-at-home orders may not have been as effective as health officials initially hoped. In fact, they may have resulted in both short- and long-term health consequences.
SIP Policies Did Not Reduce Excess Deaths
After examining SIP protocols from dozens of countries, researchers determined that restricting people from leaving their homes did not reduce excess mortality. The protocols may have also contributed to excess “deaths of despair” unrelated to the virus but to social and economic isolation effects.
To measure policy impacts, researchers took a deep dive into data using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. The resource allowed them to extract daily information at both country and U.S. state levels, but they averaged the data to create a weekly value before and after restrictions were put in place.
Specifically, the researchers looked at data from 43 countries and all 50 U.S. states and examined weekly death rates leading up to the restrictions for the years 2015–2019. They then compared these to weekly rates in 2020 after community mitigation strategies were implemented for 25 weeks. Data were assessed with the first data point marked by the first COVID-19 death in each region. Researchers also looked at how long it took states and countries to implement restrictions after the first death.
Deaths due to COVID-19 and all other unrelated causes of death were calculated using incidence rates for both the U.S. states and the 43 countries and compared to regions that did not enforce stay-at-home orders.
Regarding excess deaths, countries averaged 1.68 per 100,000 in the first 50 weeks of 2020, while the United States averaged 2.13 per 100,000 in the first 47 weeks while SIP policies were in place.
“In both settings, we fail to find that SIP policies reduced excess deaths,” the authors wrote in the paper. “SIP policies might increase or decrease COVID-19 related mortality, and at the same time might also increase mortality from other causes.” Differences in excess deaths before and after the implementation of SIP policies were not observed even when accounting for pre-SIP COVID-19 death rates, they added.
Deeper Dive
If SIP policies were meant to reduce COVID-19 deaths, there should have been a negative association between deaths and SIP measures over the 25 weeks, the authors asserted in the paper. However, they found the opposite. The longer people were sheltered, the higher the death rates from COVID-19 internationally and domestically. An upswing also occurred in relation to overall causes of death. Internationally, an estimated 10 per 100,000 excess deaths occurred compared to pre-SIP implementation. In the United States, that number was 5 per 100,000. However, the confidence interval was wide, indicating much uncertainty in the estimate.
“The results … suggest that differences in excess mortality between countries that implemented SIP policies versus countries that did not implement SIP policies were trending downwards in the weeks prior to SIP implementation,” the study authors wrote. “Similar to international comparisons, we find that SIP implementation was associated with an increase in excess mortality.”
Benefits and Risks
During the pandemic, many global government officials announced strict orders intended to limit people’s contact with each other to slow the spread of COVID-19. In theory, slowing the spread of the disease would curb infections and prevent hospitals from becoming overwhelmed.
Even if shelter-in-place policies reduced viral transmission, as some studies suggest, their impact on other health behaviors may have led to other harmful effects on physical and mental well-being, with some consequences linked to suicide and accidental death.
Furthermore, one 2021 study revealed COVID-19 is actually more transmissible when shelter-in-place orders are enacted. Informal get-togethers like birthday celebrations and other holiday gatherings, which SIP protocols did not prevent, resulted in relaxed mitigation efforts compared to those enforced in formal settings like work environments, which SIP protocols did address. These informal gatherings were associated with increased transmission rates within households.
According to a 2020 study published in JAMA Network Open, alcohol sales more than doubled in late March 2020, indicating people consumed alcohol to cope with things like anxiety, depression, and boredom associated with stay-at-home orders. Alcohol has been linked to cancer, heart disease, stroke, liver damage, and other health problems.
Other studies showed child and domestic abuse during pandemic isolation increased, and cancer screenings postponed during lockdowns may have resulted in worse cancer outcomes. Drug overdoses and homicides also increased.
I think the only unintended consequences for deaths were in China. Locking the doors from the outside and making condominiums and apartments jails does not help a person survive, especially if the rumors are true of not feeding or providing water internees.
As for the rest of the counties, they had no idea what they were doing. No precedents to work with with such a large scale problem that they could reference. the 1918 Spanish flu records, the last world pandemic, could not help them make decisions.
Anthony Fauci should be executed. Pay per view. I would invite all my friends over.
I recall numerous FReepers saying that this would be the result within a few days of the announced lockdowns. Early spring 2020.
There must be an excess of fortune tellers around here.
I guess the deaths of people who didn’t get timely or in-person health care were intended then?
This is absurd and you can go look at the Excess Deaths yourself.
There were none, as in essentially 0, Excess Deaths age 0-45 for the 2020-2021-2022 timeframe and guess what, they were stay at home people too.
The Excess Deaths for the virus years were 65+, and they aligned closely with tracked Covid deaths over that time frame.
The rest of this stuff is crap, based in agenda.
Oh, and btw, there are 0 Excess Deaths this year in that young age group(s). The died suddenly wackos have largely disappeared because of this.
The one thing worth understanding overall is that Excess Deaths of All Causes are the gold standard of what the virus did. And oddly, age 65-84, is still doing. It sliced life expectancy down to 74ish, which is not a hell of a lot higher than Russia’s.
“I guess the deaths of people who didn’t get timely or in-person health care were intended then?”
Or how the care for those who were able to get it was degraded because of the masking and protocols. We’ll never know how many. It’s tragic.
My best friend died because his doctors wouldn’t see him in person for over a year.
Who knew you can’t diagnose chronic pneumonia over the phone? /s
I was in ICU last year. I’m hearing impaired and it helps me to see the face of who is speaking to me. I was constantly asking the staff to remove their masks or speak up so I could understand what they were saying. There was the time wasted for having things repeated, and I believe I missed some important information because they refused to take the masks off and several wouldn’t speak up.
As you said, we will never know how many experienced what you and my friend did. There are a lot of conditions that can’t be properly diagnosed under those kinds of circumstances.
"The data shows that there’s been a total of 96,540 excess deaths involving cardiovascular conditions like heart attacks and strokes since February 2020."
Sounds like a cover for the jab deaths.
"In 2021, more than 892,000 of the 3,456,000 deaths the U.S. experienced, or about 1 in 4, were “excess deaths.” In 2019, that number was 483,000 deaths, or nearly 1 in 6. That represents an 84.9% increase in excess deaths in the U.S. between 2019 and 2021."
“Covid vaccines don’t work”.
The world heard around the shot.
The world herded into getting the shot
Y'all probably know that the FDA 'disproved' this protocol works after changing the dosage, removing the zinc and antibiotic, and killing some folks with the cytokine storm.
It’s a scary thing. I hope you don’t have problems again nor anyone else.
It stuns me that doctors would be too afraid to see a patient because other people have a virus. What cowardice! It’s like a cop who doesn’t want to leave the station because someone out there might commit a crime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.