The odds that the 'informants' would draw a weapon were low. The officer that shot Ashley was not an informant.
So what was this guy doing that required him to defend his 'exit' with a weapon?
That officer was one of Nancy Pelosi's 'men'. He was on guard in her office. She gave him a package that had been on her desk. She had him take the package and leave the building, and not let anything get in his way . She arranged transportation. She arranged his lodging at a special 'hotel' on a US Air Force Base. He went there and stayed there, protected by the Military. He stayed in the room and did not go out. He stayed sequestered until Nancy went to that hotel to visit him and pick up her package.
So... what was 'in' the package, or what 'was' the package ???? Why has the media and the government completely shut down any mention of the package? What was so important that the officer shot the first thing in his path and felt justified in doing so ??? (and was not even questioned).
Lost track of how many hired "Crisis Actors" breaking windows and rattling doors for the cameras ?
My best guess is that the quickly forgotten "Ashley Babbit" murder was theater also, sure looked fake anyway, I've seen better acting in old westerns.
....and since when do they get to kill a protester for the crime of climbing over a counter ! even the soldiers in Fallujah had stricter R.O.E.
The odds that the 'informants' would draw a weapon were low. The officer that shot Ashley was not an informant.
I meant that if he was going to shoot anyone, how did he manage to hit one of the few genuine Trump supporters instead of all the Antifa and FBI informants there, not "Why did he (as opposed to the informants) shoot Ashli Babbitt?". English is a heckuva language.