Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

My understanting is that she doesn’t want to see the ballots themselves, so there is no actual privacy issue. They just want to examine the envelopes the ballots were mailed in to see if the signatures match the registration cards. Newsflash, they won’t, or they’ve already been destroyed. This will prove even more fraudulent ballots were accepted.

You can’t get proof until someone lets you examine the evidence. That’s what has been being blocked since the beginning.

And could you be any more racist/sexist?

Love,
O2


16 posted on 09/23/2023 9:36:06 AM PDT by omegatoo (You know you'll get your money's worth...become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: omegatoo

Kari is assuming all questionable votes are for you. Gore tried that...


17 posted on 09/23/2023 9:39:55 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo

You can’t do it “selectively”...you have to look at every single signature. Sexist?? Hardly..


18 posted on 09/23/2023 9:42:22 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo

The ballots are not signed and are separated from the envelopes in any case so she obviously is not asking for that.
Why would a privacy exception be applicable in this case ? AZ law states ballot envelopes are legal affidavits swearing that the affiant is telling the truth and legal affidavits are used as evidence in a court of law. People knowingly sign these understanding they are doing so under penalty of perjury.


20 posted on 09/23/2023 10:43:38 AM PDT by erlayman (E )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson