Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW

> Government regulations crush small business growth and contributes to the decline of our nation’s economy. <

Two young black guys opened a deli about a mile from where I live. I stopped in soon after it opened. There was a nice menu and many tables, but no chairs.

I asked one of the owners why there weren’t any chairs. After all, who wants to eat standing up? The owner said it was a government regulation. He could only put in chairs if he first installed a handicapped bathroom, something he couldn’t afford. So no chairs.

And also no business. The place closed about six weeks after that.

Oh, and is important to mention that the owners were two black guys? Yes. They tried to do the right thing, open a small business to support their families. And the government destroyed their dreams, for no good reason.


7 posted on 10/22/2023 7:36:15 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right
Interesting story. I feel bad for those guys, but it sounds like they really didn’t do a good job of researching the legal requirements before opening the business. If they missed something as obvious as that, I wonder what kind of other things would have led to the demise of the business later.

I believe Starbucks has built its entire business model on working around local health and zoning codes. Their on-site food preparation processes don’t require ovens or grills, so they are generally classified as a “food retailer” and not a “restaurant” under municipal codes.

10 posted on 10/22/2023 7:58:50 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right
So no chairs

Heard a story one time about a Jewish drug store owner in the Deep South. When the civil rights movement started, he desegregated his lunch counter. The Chief of Police came around in person, to insist the owner comply with the ordinance requiring segregated seating at the lunch counter. The owner removed all of stools at the lunch counter, which put him in compliance, because there was no municipal ordinance requiring segregated standing areas.

The relator of the story, the owner’s son, said that removing the stools settled the issue both legally, and practically. His white patrons had no expectation of segregated standing areas, and they stood and ate next to blacks in equanimity.

21 posted on 10/22/2023 10:14:26 AM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson