Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom

“Purchaser acknowledges that the vaccine and materials related to the vaccine, and there are components and constituent materials, are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the vaccine to purchaser under the agreement. Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known. Further, to the extent applicable, purchaser acknowledges that the product shall not be serialized.”

Pfizer Purchaser Agreement Released – Reckless and Insane
https://www.independentsentinel.com/pfizer-purchaser-agreement-released-reckless-and-insane/

________________________________________

When the majority of the jabbed come to understand the above and its ramifications and the culpability of Big Pharma execs, deep state government agents, and sycophants like you in this, I would not want to be in your shoes. I hope you get what is coming to you good and hard.


10 posted on 10/24/2023 11:05:39 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: CheshireTheCat

“Further, to the extent applicable, purchaser acknowledges that the product shall not be serialized”

Not be serialized? What does that mean?


14 posted on 10/25/2023 3:29:45 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

So, the government of South Africa was so concerned about Covid that they entered into a contract with Pfizer to purchase vaccine before any were available?

And the government added a clause stating that they were (at the time) aware that no vaccine had yet been approved by a regulatory agency?

And this legal language giving the government of South Africa a legal means to break the contract without penalty if no Pfizer vaccine ended up being approved is, somehow, a statement that governments/pharmaceutical companies were being reckless and irresponsible with people’s lives?

In simple, everyday language, what this means is that the government of South Africa expected a vaccine that has met all safety and efficacy criteria in order to be granted market approval by a regulatory agency. They never had any intention of giving an unapproved vaccine candidate to their population.

The ways that professional antivaxxers twist routine legal and medical language into something sinister never ceases to amaze me.


20 posted on 10/25/2023 6:19:09 AM PDT by exDemMom (Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson