Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

He did. But he changed to saying he would sign for the exceptions. Still, Beshear ran the commercials. I’m 100% Pro-Life and don’t believe there should be exceptions. At least bring the child to birth and give him or her up for adoption. I don’t believe a child should be punished with death because of the sin/crime of his or her father. Abortion even in these circumstances can leave physical and/or psychological scars on the woman though this is covered up. In a debate Beshear said he has always favored “reasonable” restrictions against “late-term” abortions. So what would constitute an unreasonable restriction on late-term abortion? The commercials and the situation is disgusting. The candidate who weakened from a 100% to 98% Pro-Life position is portrayed as a demon on the issue by the Governor who wants to leave a crack in the window for infanticide.


22 posted on 11/07/2023 12:06:59 PM PST by MDLION ("Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: MDLION

A friend once said Republicans should ask Dems, if we concede to exceptions for only rape, incest, or the life of the mother l, would you democrats sign that bill? We know the answer would be no, but it would put them on the spot. 99% stopping of abortion is much better than 0%.


34 posted on 11/07/2023 2:52:36 PM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson