Posted on 12/14/2023 8:40:46 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
Your inane behavoir deserves no response.
Is it the lawyers, or the justice system? I would say it is the justice system for even allowing the case to go forward.
Who are you going to vote for Woolley?
The law doesn't matter, and the lawyers don't matter. What matters is the guy who is in a position of power wants to get Trump, so it's foolish to think there could be any other outcome from our corrupt judicial system.
So will you vote for Trump in 2024 or are you just here to campaign against Trump? Haley and DeSantis are not going to win the primary.
Is it the lawyers, or the justice system? I would say it is the justice system for even allowing the case to go forward.
**************************
The democrats changed the law, to allow Carroll’s frivolous lawsuit.
A grand jury full of retards rubber stamped.
Carroll’s evidence was two journalist buddies who lied in court, saying Carroll told them about it in 1995 or 1996, right after it happened.(yeah right)
The crooked judge was offering ridiculous instructions to the jury.
The jury found in favor of Carroll, which shows how idiotic NY jurors are.
At this point, civil trials could be eliminated and it would actually improve our corrupt law system.
This goes back years. But if anti-conservatives like you won’t use logic.
That said, I will agree with you that Trump gives people who are professionally unknown--or little known--a chance (like Michael Cohen and Omarosa) when he really shouldn't have. He's a soft touch that way. He likes to see otherwise insignificant people succeed and that's sometimes a mistake.
That's where this whole idea for The Apprentice came from. That might work when you own your own business, but it doesn't work at the national level of politics.
And as for your accusation of me being anti-conservative and not using logic. Hmmm. I don't think so...but I'll think about that. I've often been accused of being too logical. ;-)
Check
Could Trump pick a date and say I was someplace else that date, and here’s the proof?
This was a three judge panel hearing an appeal in a defamation case, not the judge in the NYAG fraud trial.
“This group has made a concerted organized effort to cancel any lawyer who dares represent Trump.
Ah yes, forgot about them. Yes, they’re the main culprit in this.
And who funds them?
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/65-project/
https://www.axios.com/2022/03/07/trump-election-lawyers-disbar
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/03/legal-group-disbar-lawyers-who-helped-trump
I think a lot of lawyers decline to represent him because he does not take their advice and the chances of their getting paid are slim.
And why do you think that?
I read that law firms were under big pressure to not represent him unless they wanted to lose other clients and we can see what they’ve done to those who did work for him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.