Yes, this is awesome. Idiot presidents son will cement the unconstitutionality of the federal law !!!
What part of “shall not be infringed“ do they not understand?
Charge him with making a false statement on an unconstitutional document.
If you or I had filled out the forms and PERJURED ourselves we would very quickly be doing about 5 years in a federal penitentiary.
But Hunter is SPECIAL don’t you understand, his daddy was VP and he automatically has more RIGHTS and PRIVILIGES than you PEONS!
Hunter lawyer: Edna, look on the closet floor behind the Halloween decorations. Get out that old US Constitution booklet and dust it off. We’re going to use it to help Hunter.
Since Baby Biden has threatened to flee the US if Trump is elected, the prosecutors should go to court and request million dollar bail for him.
The project of disciplining all the militia of the United States is as futile as it would be injurious, if it were capable of being carried into execution. A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice. It is not a day, or even a week, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and a serious public inconvenience and loss. It would form an annual deduction from the productive labor of the country, to an amount which, calculating upon the present numbers of the people, would not fall far short of the whole expense of the civil establishments of all the States. To attempt a thing which would abridge the mass of labor and industry to so considerable an extent, would be unwise: and the experiment, if made, could not succeed, because it would not long be endured. Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the people at large, than to have them properly armed and equipped; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them once or twice in the course of a year.Hamilton makes it clear that the Framers expected the people-militia to be competent in the use of arms in case they were called to defend the security of their free states.But though the scheme of disciplining the whole nation must be abandoned as mischievous or impracticable; yet it is a matter of the utmost importance that a well-digested plan should, as soon as possible, be adopted for the proper establishment of the militia. The attention of the government ought particularly to be directed to the formation of a select corps of moderate extent, upon such principles as will really fit them for service in case of need. By thus circumscribing the plan, it will be possible to have an excellent body of well-trained militia, ready to take the field whenever the defense of the State shall require it. This will not only lessen the call for military establishments, but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist...
A drug addict would not be capable of acting in this capacity, would be likely to neglect his duties of maintaining his arms, and therefore would be a danger to others should he be called into action.
If the purpose of the second amendment was to form a citizen militia that was "little, if at all, inferior to [standing armies] in discipline and the use of arms," a drug addict would fail that criterion and ought to be excluded from this expectation as long as he is still addicted to drugs.
-PJ
Has any other president's family been called "first son, daughter or bastard granddaughter"?
Asking for a friend.🤔
I would guess that the drug/booze question on form 4473 is lied on the most. I did see a guy turned away at the local gunstore because he reeked of pot when trying to buy a gun.
Tel pere, pas tel fils