[Freest Republican]

By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the Court has created a problem that only it can fix. Until then, Obergefell will continue to have “ruinous consequences for religious liberty.”
576 U. S., at 734 (THOMAS, J., dissenting).

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-926_5hdk.pdf

[Albion Wilde]

By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the Court has created a problem that only it can fix. Until then, Obergefell will continue to have “ruinous consequences for religious liberty.” 576 U. S., at 734 (THOMAS, J., dissenting).

Does "Thomas, J." mean Justice Clarence Thomas?