Posted on 01/03/2024 8:57:01 AM PST by SunkenCiv
I think the fact that he’s Jewish may have a lot to do with his strong reaction.
Birds of a feather...
The Harvard Crimson
snip
Behind the scenes, the Harvard Corporation headed by billionaire Penny Pritzker played a key role in preparing Claudine Gay for her widely criticized congressional testimony on Dec. 5, and a four-person subcommittee of the board conducted an investigation into the claims of plagiarism against Gay.
The Corporation was first informed of the plagiarism allegations in late October when they launched an independent investigation of anonymous claims privately sent by the New York Post. Harvard’s lawyers from Clare Locke — a high-powered law firm specializing in defamation lawsuits — threatened to sue the Post for the claims before the investigation unearthed several instances of inadequate citation.
After Gay’s testimony before Congress — during which she declined to say whether calls for the genocide of Jewish people would violate University policies — the Corporation waited one week before releasing a unanimous statement in support of her presidency.
The board also qualified their Dec. 12 statement of support by noting that the decision was reached after “extensive deliberation” — a significant public rebuke of a new president.
WilmerHale partner and former Corporation senior fellow William F. Lee ’72 played a major role in the testimony preparations despite having departed the board and also not specializing in congressional testimony preparation, The Crimson previously reported. Lee’s role in the preparation raised questions about his lingering influence over the board and the role the Corporation itself played in the testimony prep, which may have contributed to the group’s decision to back Gay last month.
Just minutes after Gay announced her resignation, the Harvard Corporation released an email statement to affiliates thanking Gay for her dedication to the school and pointing to her previous apology. The email — which did not acknowledge the board’s previous unanimous statement in support of Gay — suggested that Gay’s resignation was her own choice.
“We have accepted her resignation,” the email reads. “We do so with sorrow.” No members of the Corporation — including Pritzker — have released personal statements on Gay’s resignation. Harvard spokesperson Jonathan L. Swain declined to comment for this article.
When allegations of plagiarism — which have continued to surface — were first reported, the Corporation and its presidential search process that selected Gay were further shoved into the national spotlight. Lasting only five months, the search that promoted Gay to the University’s top post marked the shortest presidential selection process in 70 years — and it led to the shortest presidential tenure in Harvard’s history.
Amid the mounting uncertainty surrounding Gay’s leadership, two members of the Harvard Corporation — Tracy P. Palandjian ’93 and outgoing University Treasurer Paul J. Finnegan ’75 — met with leaders of the Council on Academic Freedom at Harvard on Dec. 19. Though the group did not discuss Gay’s resignation, according to the four faculty in attendance, two weeks later, she announced her exit from the University’s top post.
As public scrutiny of Harvard begins to shift from Gay to the Corporation that selected her, some prominent alumni and donors have advocated for changes to the board — including new personnel.
In a Monday post on X prior to Gay’s resignation, Bill A. Ackman ’88 — one of Gay’s harshest critics and another major donor to the University — called for an “immediate investigation” into the Harvard Corporation. In particular, Ackman took aim at the board’s handling of the plagiarism allegations against Gay.
In an interview with The Crimson, Peter L. Malkin ’55 — a major Harvard donor and the namesake of the Malkin Athletic Center — called for members of the Corporation that selected Gay to step down.
“I do think that the relatively hasty action by the Corporation in the search process indicated to me that not a full review was made of qualified candidates who are out there,” Malkin said.
Kenneth G. Lipper, a former member of the Executive Committee of the Committee of University Resources — a group consisting of people who have donated at least $1 million to Harvard — urged the University to focus on the future and Garber’s path forward as interim president.
“When we suffer a great loss,” Lipper said, “we must analyze the whys, repair what we can, and accelerate into a fresh performance phase reflective of our 300-year history of scholarly achievement and national leadership.”
—Staff writer Emma H. Haidar can be reached at emma.haidar@thecrimson.com. Follow her on X @HaidarEmma.
—Staff writer Cam E. Kettles can be reached at cam.kettles@thecrimson.com. Follow her on X @cam_kettles or on Threads @camkettles.
......Bill Ackman calls for Harvard board led by Obama’s Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker to resign after ‘disaster’ President Claudine Gay: ‘Replacing her is not enough’.......
I heartily agree with him!! And fire corrupt Penny Pritzker from the Alumni Association, too!
And serial plagiarist Claudine “Mama Doc” Gay should be totally fired from Harvard! No faculty position—no $1 M salary!
Moreover, DEI at Harvard, MIT, etc. etc. must be totally abolished! Bring back feee speech and free inquiry, and admit, promote, and hire the most qualified regardless of race or ethnicity!
This JOB of getting rid of her is only half done. THEN they should move on to the Harvard Board that supposedly looked into her transgressions and cleared her. WHAT A CROCK!
Never trust a Harvard Lawyer again, unless they plagiarize from a DUKE Lawyer!
It is money at every school. Professors used to live like clergy. Now they make Wall Street bucks and students borrow hundreds of thousands that they have little intention of repaying. And the government funds it all. One would think it was all some grand scheme. </s>
I note your sarcasm tag.
I completed 8th grade, then- dropped out of high school one month after school started due to personal (family) reasons, AND left home a year later at age 15.
At age 24, I studied and took a GED test before joining the military, scoring a B+ grade. This was a very hard test considering that I had not been engaged in formal educational testing/comprehension for the last 10 years.
I then went on to score 143 on my military ASVAB test in 1982, qualifying me for any of the 400 jobs (MOSs) available to recruits.
My point is that I have almost zero financial investment in my education, and I would go up against any of these GEN Z graduates who are staring down the barrel at $250,000 OR MORE in student debt upon graduation. I would also go up against their teachers and professors, who pull down $150,000 to $300,000, or even way more in annual salary (often funded by the taxpayer) in a head-to-head test of intelligence.
As a kid (boomer) we worked for the satisfaction of working (a job well done and sometimes for no pay). I would not want to grow up at any other time.
Once again pointing out the obvious, have you seen ANY Republicans advocating for reducing funds to these publically funded brainwashing/indoctrination centers that masquerade as institutes of higher learning?
Nor have they EVER defunded NPR.
GOP (spit)
Ahhh Penny Pritzker (an old staunch Mercedes Marxist), I might have known she was behind all the recent crap at Harvard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.