Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Terminology.

Not nuclear sites.

ICBM sites. ICBM sites certainly have to launch if targetted, and as I just noted, if the intention of the article was missiles that are not ICBMs then there is no reason Russia can not base them next to the ICBMs.

Incoming threats then force an ICBM launch.


14 posted on 01/11/2024 8:19:24 AM PST by Owen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Owen; dforest

I still don’t see what you guys are talking about, this is Russia saying they will launch nuclear weapons if Ukraine tries to interfere with the sites that Russia is using to attack Ukraine’s cities with conventional missiles.

In July it was threatening WWIII nuclear war for something else.

“Former Russian president warns of nuclear response if Ukraine counteroffensive is successful”
https://thehill.com/homenews/4128618-former-russian-president-warns-of-nuclear-response-if-ukraine-counter-offensive-is-successful/


19 posted on 01/11/2024 8:32:27 AM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Owen

The article said nothing about limiting the sites to “ICBM sites.” In fact, the descriptor “ICBM” is nowhere to be found in the article.


35 posted on 01/11/2024 9:53:33 AM PST by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson