Posted on 01/18/2024 3:32:51 AM PST by Morgana
She didn't praise Harris' "rhetoric on abortion," she praised the fact that Harris didn't present another word-salad while speaking.
-PJ
Fron one overactor to another, her appreciation of Harris makes sense (now bat your eyes, honey)
Exactly.
Kayleigh is right. GOPers really need to simplify their position and state clearly, before they forever lose over half of America. Restrictions on abortion “Yes” Exceptions “Yes”
“I really wish Paregoric was still on the market, I really need it after reading some of these stories.”
Try ipecac!
Why is this a news story?
Lots of people and most of the media are strongly pro-abortion. Kind of a “dog bites man” headline.
For men and those that would compromise with people who only value certain lives.. you will get old, you will get sick.. Does someone else have the right to end your life without a single word from you.???
If you allow them to compromise, then that is what you are agreeing to.
Some doctor or judge can end your life at their convenience. Let’s say, it’s very expensive to rehabilitate you and you’re just past the age where you matter to them….
This is not about abortion, it is about the value of a human being. We see every country in the world now starting to euthanize people without a word from them or their families.
We are one of the last countries on earth fighting g this fight.
“Because she knows what is true and that is, is the GOP has lost every single abortion ballot initiative post-Roe,” McEnany continued as she rattled off statistics and election results showing the issue of reproductive rights as a major political liability for the GOP.Content doesn't match the clickbait headline.“This is why I’ve implored the GOP as someone who is pro-life myself and adamantly so: Speak from a place of compassion … and be pro-mother, not just pro-baby.”
Why is anyone still watching Fox?
Purposefully misleading to generate clicks.
Kayleigh McEnany did not “heap praise” on “Que mala” Harris, or if it was, it was faint indeed. The caution was for REPUBLICANS to tread lightly on the issue, and not allow the Democrat Socialists to use the strategy of limiting or even prohibiting abortion as a club in the battle for the younger female voters. The safety valve has to be there for a certain portion of these younger females of reproductive age, so they may focus away from this single issue, and look at the whole picture of anti-life and anti-growth politics, of which access to abortion is only one facet. The rest of it, which is wholesale adoption of the “Rules for Radicals” formulated by Saul Alinsky, is a way forward to making a command-and-control regime the means of concentration of power into the hands of a malign few, and the impoverishment of just about everybody else.
Sunk cost fallacy?…
Agreed
Whopper of a headline
The Hill. Separating people one article at a time.
It’s not reproductive freedom. It’s murder of children in the womb.
If you watched some of the others, maybe you’d know.
Kayleigh is very young, and the young often speak without thinking too much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.