Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Twotone
More on point:

The Federal Government is in DIRECT violation of THE CONSTITUTION:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion.
U.S.Const., Art. IV, Sec. 4.

Unconstitutional federal Court actions or decisions (here), acts and laws MUST be defied!!!

The easiest of the three to defy is Court decisions because the Court has no enforcement power.

I'll add, TEXAS and GOV. ABBOTT: STOP taking federal funding and become financially INDEPENDENT from the bankrupt feds. Your constitutionally sovereign state is meant to be INDEPENDENT!!!

3 posted on 01/25/2024 1:21:20 PM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim W N
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4211604/posts?page=1500#1500
4 posted on 01/25/2024 1:25:04 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N
The Federal Government is in DIRECT violation of THE CONSTITUTION:

The Federal Government has abandoned the rule of law. What matters now is who can control the police and military forces.

What matters after that is who can continue to pay armed forces of any sort.

11 posted on 01/25/2024 1:37:20 PM PST by flamberge (Are we there yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N
TX and the other 25 State Governors are standing with the Constitution, the biden regime and the Globalists, plus the left, are the ones who have seceded from the US.
18 posted on 01/25/2024 1:58:03 PM PST by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! DEATH TO MARXISM AND LEFTISM! AMERICA, COWBOY UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N
  1. Start with your underlined red type Art. IV, §4 Federal responsibility.
  2. Add the Art. II, §1 Presidential Oath which incorporates that responsibility into person of the President.
  3. Insert Gov. Abbott formally declaring Texas has been invaded and invoking its powers under Art. I §10. I don't see how anyone can gainsay its governors declaration of an invasion unless action by the Texas legislature was required to make that official. But for an emergency action like this allowing the governor alone to declare it makes more sense than legislative action just as the President can act and act quickly without awaiting Congress in true emergencies.
  4. Art. IV §1 Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public act, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State. Abbot's declaration is covered by this, ie. California can't laugh it off.
  5. Art. III §3 Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. How can those officially invading Texas NOT be its enemies and thus by the Full Faith and Credit clause NOT be the enemies of the whole? Team Biden hasn't started shooting at the Texas Guard so isn't yet levying war against them and thus the US, but it certainly is giving aid and comfort to the invaders and adhering to them. All that's left to convict on the Constitutional definition of treason is the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. Shouldn't be too hard to find two witnesses.
  6. Try them in which venue? The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the State where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed. DC isn't a state so crimes there get tried wherever Congress had specified, which the J6 gulag teaches needs to be changed! BUT if you can get two witnesses to the same overt treasonous act done within Texas you get to try them in Texas! Seek out witnesses appropriately. However I'm not certain state prosecutors have jurisdiction to charge a federal crime of treason. And although state level laws on treason against particular states exist I don't know if the rest of my arguments herein apply to those laws.
  7. That except in cases of impeachment does block charges in a friendly venue against an important and deserving set of legal targets: Art . II, §3 The president, vice-president and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. IIRC that means Biden, Harris and everyone Biden appointed who required Confirmation have to be impeached and convicted by the Senate before criminal courts can touch them. 218 House votes to impeach is marginally conceivable; 67 Senate votes to convict would take an acid trip to conceive. However, although politics prevents their conviction by the Senate, they can still have their treason cases presented in the public arena and their reputations impeached, non-legally, therein. But lower level traitors could be charged. And, surprisingly, so could Congresscritters: They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective houses, and in going to and returning from the same So if Ken Paxton can find two witnesss to an overt Congressional act of treason within Texas, he can charge them in Texas and their home state must extradite them (Art. IV §2 Clause 2)

29 posted on 01/25/2024 8:39:37 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Biden/Harris events are called dodo ops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson