Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

hmmmm...unwoke or something else?


2 posted on 02/15/2024 10:44:52 AM PST by xoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xoxox

Global economic depression incoming.


4 posted on 02/15/2024 10:47:09 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xoxox

They know that Trump is coming! They’re all scared!


5 posted on 02/15/2024 10:47:36 AM PST by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xoxox

It’s something else. I have several stock funds. Suddenly, after Biden became president, they went from making about four or five percent to losing bigtime. I researched the biggest losers and found that exactly thirty percent of each fund was composed of companies that said their primary concern was ESG or DEI. A couple of them had a VP or director of ESG or DEI. Several had a staff of people dedicated to those things.

Here’s the legal problem. A company has a fiduciary responsibility to protect and grow the value of the firm for their owners, the stockholders. These firms had mostly declining earnings going back, as far as I could trace, to when they went woke. When Elon Musk started talking about lawsuits for breach, a lot of firms scaled back the mention of ESG in their earnings calls. But not the actual policies involved.

Why would a firm like Oppenheimer promote those funds which are obviously not going to make much money for their clients? It’s because the biggest investors are Blackrock and Calpers. Both of those have said if you’re not onboard with ESG or DEI you won’t get their investments and therefore the fund managers won’t get their bonuses.

I’m astonished there haven’t been huge lawsuits, but they will be on the horizon if the government changes to something remotely conservative. Right now, I suspect the government is putting its thumb on the scales, preventing lawsuits.


14 posted on 02/15/2024 11:07:44 AM PST by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xoxox

Hurting other businesses thats all. Priorities, priorities.


22 posted on 02/15/2024 11:40:31 AM PST by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xoxox

Probably more about the $$$. Climate BS and wokeness, as it turns out, is not that profitable. They are money guys first and ideologues last.


25 posted on 02/15/2024 12:05:24 PM PST by vivenne (⁹)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xoxox

Dtarting to hit their investors’ bottom lines. Investors not having proper social consciousness are mad and de-investing.


27 posted on 02/15/2024 12:34:16 PM PST by arthurus ( covfefe H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xoxox

Something else.


29 posted on 02/15/2024 12:58:20 PM PST by sauropod (Ne supra crepidam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xoxox

it would exit the so-called Climate Action 100+ investor group because of the expansion of its in-house sustainability team and the establishment of its climate risk framework in recent years.


not stopping, in house. must be a reason.


34 posted on 02/15/2024 7:59:58 PM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson