Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gitmo
For Judge Imamoron to issue this ruling, he stuck with his preposterous claim Mar-A-Lago was worth only $18 million. This, despite mountains of evidence proving it was worth many times more than $18 million. In your face, bold corruption.

Imamoron is the type of "judge" Stalin would have been proud of.
13 posted on 02/17/2024 12:56:49 PM PST by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dan in Wichita
For Judge Imamoron to issue this ruling, he stuck with his preposterous claim Mar-A-Lago was worth only $18 million. This, despite mountains of evidence proving it was worth many times more than $18 million. In your face, bold corruption.

What business is it of the judge in a free market. Trump could have valued MarALargo at 1.8 billion, so what?

The banks were free to walk away from the loan application or they could have come back with their own valuation.

20 posted on 02/17/2024 1:01:16 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Dan in Wichita

just wait until the next tax assessment of Mara lago!


30 posted on 02/17/2024 1:17:54 PM PST by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson