Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hardspunned
the DoD had not developed or implemented a plan for sustaining the Bradleys, Strykers, and Abrams provided to the UAF.

Hadn't anticipated that they would be come the targets of Russian artillery and anti-tank missiles. Putin was supposed to have run out of them three weeks after the war started. Oh, and he is dead from cancer, Parkinsons and poisoned by Russian democtratic proglobohomo patriots.

3 posted on 02/24/2024 6:13:30 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson

It’s a pretty damning report.

(U) The DoD and the UAF faced additional risks as a result of the lack of guidance
identifying the extent or limits of U.S. support and roles and responsibilities
for planning and executing sustainment for the Bradleys, Strykers, and Abrams
provided to the UAF. Without a plan to provide sufficient training and support
equipment, the UAF is at an increased risk of being unable to sustain these
weapon systems adequately to deter or defend against future Russian aggression.
Furthermore, the DoD faced increased risks because it lacked the ability to
accurately predict enduring sustainment costs for U.S.‑provided equipment


6 posted on 02/24/2024 6:30:40 PM PST by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson