i had been secretly hoping for an extension of the testimony part of the hearing.
there seemed to be too many unexplored issues.
if mcafee were to extend the testimony (i asked myself) who would he hear from on the stand?
my candidates would be either wade or bradley. however, i preferred bradley, because it is generally better to start low and work one’s way higher in cases involving corruption and a general scarcity of direct corroboration.
bradley needs to be given a chance to testify outside the confines of the atty-client privilege.
next, ideally, wade needs to be recalled to resolve inconsistencies between his testimony, bradley’s testimony, and the mittelstadt cellhawk affidavit.
after that, wade needs to be given a chance to roll on booty-clapping Princess DIE for “sexual harassment.”
please pass the popcorn...