> Also, if there had been no video… <
You’ve got that right. Below is a video where an off-duty cop sucker-punches a civilian. It’s a case of road rage. Another cop went to the off-duty cop’s house to investigate the incident.
The off-duty cop had the nerve to ask that the guy he punched be arrested for breach of the peace. No can do, said the investigating officer. There’s video.
https://youtu.be/GMcHGYIk-rg?si=onkW5DrCwX_88ga5
[[The off-duty cop had the nerve to ask that the guy he punched be arrested for breach of the peace. No can do, said the investigating officer. There’s video.]]
And yet, there was video of a black woman repeatedly smashing her car into another white man’s car beczuse he wouldn’t move after she had backed into him
She got in her car and sped off after getting out and screaming at him for the 3rd time. Leaving the scene of an accident she did.
Cops “investigsted” and actually made the asinine statement that they “couldn’t arrest her” because “video doesn’t tell the whole story” yet the whole incident was caught on camera, plain as day- she even attempted to hit the man when he got out to “try to protect his car from further damage”
I was stunned/not stunned by the outcome. Another person not connected had been videoing the whole,thing- there was no ambiguity at all- no chance of misinterpreting what took place.
It happend in Los Angeles of course.
Another incident with a black da who was shown evidence of gang shootout in traffic which was stopped because of the shootout. Clear as day, showed a man get murdered. Da refused to prosecute citing the fact that she “determined that the evidence was insufficient to meet our burden of proof to approve felony charges,”(even though uniformed officers who were caught in the traffic jam had their cameras rolling for the whole time, capturing everything) and also citing that the incident was “mutual combat”