[edwinland]

I totally think it’s relevant for you to post this today, or even for PJ Media to take an old article from last month and move it up to their front page today as a flashback.

But if they publish an article on March 14 about something that happened on Feb. 21 they should not say “ Finally: Federal Judge Nails DOJ” because that makes it sound like they are reporters reporting news rather than commentators “finally” getting around to talking about last month’s news.

[thinden]

you may also consider identifying that my posting comment suggested that this piece was a re-post rather than inferring that I was being deceptive rather than making a point of relevance based on today's breaking news out of GA

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

maybe re-posted because the words of the day today seem to be “selective prosecution”?

seems to be a lot of it going on but few judges strong enough to base a ruling on it.