Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
In what appears to be massive judicial collusion, judges in J6 cases ignored precedent and repeatedly referenced one another’s cases to justify the use of 1512(c)(2) against J6ers.

That's called judicial misconduct, and it's what federal judges do far too often. Judges who can't follow precedent, or declare their decisions are "not precedential" are in the wrong line of work. They should be disciplined, and judicial discipline does not require impeachment.
4 posted on 03/15/2024 12:04:38 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Franklin
stare decisis is Latin for "lazy jurisprudence".

Each case should be decided on it's individual merits. Anyone thinking that something that happened in a case 200 years ago has anything other than historical interest in a case today is trying very hard not to think for themselves.

Then again... I still think our entire legal code needs to be burned on a pyre and we start over with a fresh copy of the Constitution and a blank slate.

10 posted on 03/15/2024 12:21:26 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson