Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Jackson Complains First Amendment Is ‘Hamstringing’ Feds’ Censorship Efforts
The Federalist ^ | MARCH 18, 2024 | JORDAN BOYD

Posted on 03/18/2024 11:55:44 AM PDT by packagingguy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Red Badger

The purpose of our Constitution is expressed in its Preamble.


61 posted on 03/18/2024 1:01:22 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqiblXFlZuk


62 posted on 03/18/2024 1:10:26 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Which boils down to restraining the government and freeing the people............


63 posted on 03/18/2024 1:14:56 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Same mentality as a ghetto stickup man.


64 posted on 03/18/2024 1:19:09 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: budj

She’s being paid to be stupid.


65 posted on 03/18/2024 1:20:04 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

Stolen elections have consequences


66 posted on 03/18/2024 1:24:03 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
Jackson expressed skepticism at reigning in

Reining in. Maybe the author is using a buggy spell checker.

67 posted on 03/18/2024 1:25:19 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

I think the constitution doesn’t mean what she thinks it means. 😆


68 posted on 03/18/2024 1:27:16 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Whoa boy


69 posted on 03/18/2024 1:27:50 PM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

>>> that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information

Government bureaucrats cannot be allowed to judge what is or isn’t harmful.


70 posted on 03/18/2024 1:28:09 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

See #67.


71 posted on 03/18/2024 1:28:23 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: midwest_hiker

The government has social media accounts. Nothing prevents them from warning people to stay away from bridges.


72 posted on 03/18/2024 1:35:58 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s a misleading throwaway line at FR that demeans the purposes of our Constitution.


73 posted on 03/18/2024 1:39:10 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

By her own logic, Justice Jackson should be silenced because what she proposes threatens human rights and the Constitution.


74 posted on 03/18/2024 1:42:46 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Not sure she understands that but she is trying to see how far the government should be able to go and the AG from Louisiana is not pushing back at all. He’s agreeing with her that the government has the right to suppress speech.


75 posted on 03/18/2024 1:53:21 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jdege

“Government bureaucrats cannot be allowed to judge what is or isn’t harmful.”

Exactly. The AG from Louisiana is not doing a good job making that point. He’s actually agreeing with the idiot KJT that the gov has a right in some cases, to suppress speech, like when kids are exposed to bad things.....crazy.


76 posted on 03/18/2024 1:55:24 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

That pesky Constitution keeps getting in the way of our Socialist Utopia.


77 posted on 03/18/2024 2:03:32 PM PDT by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

It actually is total as far as “opining” what’s true or false, good or bad.


78 posted on 03/18/2024 2:04:43 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

The Constitution now says whatever five out of nine Supreme Court Justices want it to say. Of course, one problem with having a “flexible” Constitution is that at any time another five out of nine Supreme Court Justices may want it to say something different.


79 posted on 03/18/2024 2:07:33 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ( Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

She’s a perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect. She’s too ignorant to know she’s ignorant.


80 posted on 03/18/2024 2:31:27 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson