Posted on 03/22/2024 12:13:41 PM PDT by Red Badger
Not since Prohibition has the federal government sought to ban a product as popular as the internal combustion engine.
This week, the Environmental Protection Agency released its final emissions standards rule, requiring that 70% of new vehicle sales be pure battery-powered electric or hybrids by 2032.
Prohibition was a disaster and ended 13 years after it began. If implemented, this rule to take away Americans’ choice in cars will be equally harmful.
This new rule comes at a time when auto manufacturers are dialing back on EV investments because EVs are left unsold on dealers’ lots. EV maker Fisker has stopped production. Apple is switching from building EVs to investing in artificial intelligence. Ford has paused shipments of the new F-150 Lightning pickup trucks. Mercedes and BMW no longer plan to go all-electric by 2030.
EVs are more expensive, take a long time to recharge, and lose battery range in cold weather—especially when car heating is used. The bestselling vehicle in America is the F-150 pickup truck, and the electric version costs $17,000 more than the gasoline model and does not have the towing or lugging capability of the gas-powered version.
This rule will put small businesses and farmers who need gasoline-powered pickup trucks out of business. They can’t do their jobs with electric vehicles, because recharging saps valuable time from a day. Consider landscapers who go from house to house improving people’s yards. No charging stations are nearby, and they can’t take two-hour breaks to find a charging station to recharge.
The disproportionate effect on small businesses and agriculture will result in higher prices for services and food, and upward pressures on inflation. People already follow food prices closely and complain that food costs more.
The rule will cause electricity outages because the grid, even by 2032, is unlikely to be set up for 10 million electric vehicles (70% of today’s new car sales) to charge, a number that would grow over time.
Electricity outages mean that people won’t be able to charge their EVs, and that other services and appliances that rely on electricity won’t be reliable either. That means scheduling homework and cooking around when the power comes on.
A companion power-plant rule from the EPA, not yet released in final form, would make electricity more expensive. The proposed rule would require the closure by 2040 of all power plants that did not sequester 90% of carbon emissions. In an act of stunning dishonesty, EPA does not mention its proposed power-plant rule in its final emissions standards rule.
EPA justifies its regulation on the grounds that America will have cleaner air. But EVs are not emissions free, and they impose costs on the environment that gasoline-powered cars do not share. Electrifying the U.S. vehicle fleet would have practically no effect on global temperatures by 2100, even as it raises inflation and lowers gross domestic product.
Electricity for battery-powered vehicles comes from coal and natural gas, rather than renewables. Solar, wind, and nuclear power are generally fully used for other purposes, and additional sources of energy to meet electricity demand come from fossil fuels and hydropower. Until emissions-free fuels are common enough to have a net environmental benefit, battery-powered vehicles will not reduce emissions.
Producing batteries causes emissions. Batteries are produced in China, using energy from coal-fired power plants. Producing batteries for electric vehicles uses carbon, and the longer the range of the battery, the more carbon is used. In addition, transporting batteries from China to the United States generates emissions.
Mining battery ingredients causes environmental damage. EV batteries weigh about 1,000 pounds and can reach 2,000 pounds. About 100,000 pounds of ore are needed to get the lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, and copper to make the batteries function. To get the 100,000 pounds of ore, it’s necessary to move 500,000 pounds of earth.
Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is partly performed by children who are sent into the mines to retrieve the minerals. China, Chile, Argentina, and Australia are home to potentially damaging lithium mines.
When the battery is worn out, it must be disposed of. Some materials such as plastics, copper, aluminum, nickel, and cobalt are worth recycling. The remainder is disposed of in landfills, using a method to ensure that the lithium-ion batteries do not catch fire.
Raising the cost of transportation and meddling with Americans’ personal mobility is never wise. EVs are not suited for most of America, a large country of wide-open spaces, where inexpensive individual car transportation is a birthright.
This sweeping industrial policy will have disastrous economic and personal effects, as manufacturers waste resources investing in products that many do not want to buy, and as the cost of transportation rises.
Banning alcohol didn’t work as intended, and neither will banning the internal combustion engine.
Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE (auto manufacturers, drivers, mechanics, et al), needs to tell the government to bugger off with their edicts!!!!
They so easily crawled in bed with this admin over the EV thing, ‘eff them all.
He will do whatever China wants.
WE are the (neo) Marxists now
TeslaHumper and his buddies imposing prohibition on the little people with no mandate
It’s hard to feel sorry for GM & Ford when they’ve kinda been cheerleaders for Biden’s EV-mandate crap instead of pushing back.
The American capitalist system is at stake.
The idiots who run the woke government/corporation/partnerships are simply doing what Communist China does. Shameful.
If they get sand kicked in their eyes enough times maybe the corporate bosses at the auto industry will stand up and fight. The money given them from taxpayers for battery research (2010s) and then switching to EV production will not be enough for the losses as people not forced by law to buy an EV will revolt and leaave them on the car dealer lots.
If Trump wins these mandates will be reversed on his first day.
….and the automakers will bend over again without protest.
I don’t feel a bit sorry for them or the unions. I do feel sorry for shareholders and for the country.
MUCH MORE IMPORTANTLY, the US Consumer faces a Grim Future with Der Führer’s decision to ram EVs down our throats by outlawing ICE cars via a back door CO2 maneuver.
Maybe Congress can stop this. (ha, ha, ha, ha)
Not good enough, We the People should be Demanding loudly and publicly that ALL Government Employee’s Nationwide be PROHIBITED from Using, Owning or Possessing ANY ICE powered vehicle of any kind and exclusively use EV vehicles for ALL Travel in perpetuity.
> Not since Prohibition has the federal government sought to ban a product as popular as the internal combustion engine. <
Prohibition: Alcohol banned by a Constitutional amendment, passed by Congress and then by 46 states.
EV mandates: ICE vehicles banned by unelected bureaucrats at the EPA.
Quite a difference, eh?
You better feel sorry for all of US who will be forced to buy EVs we DO NOT WANT.
Union support gets hosed.
You are the carbon they are eliminating.
They should engage in massive disobedience toward this rule. Just continue business as usual. We all should disobey as well. They can’t put 330 million people in jail.
What impact will this threat have on the fuel distribution infrastructure?
The #ing Rats are reckless and disruptive.
You could almost say it’s going to be a bloodbath.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.