Even with an object, it’s still rape.
“Even with an object, it’s still rape.”
I agree, generally.
What matters here is what the law says. And that varies by state. This is Oregon which defines “rape” to include “sexual intercourse” (in first-, second-, and third-degree cases, which is every kind). It appears Orgon defines what happened as “Unlawful sexual penetration”.
Because the perpetrators were minors (and assuming they were within 3 years of the age of the victim), the assault and/or rape charges would not be considered statutory. But under the circumstances I think the prosecution and/or plaintiff would have very little difficulty proving what happened was non-consensual.