[Kazan]

The author is saying the Ukraine will lose without foreign supplies

We've already spent $150 billion on Ukraine and the Ukrainians have lost 20% of their territory.

Now, Ukraine's military is shambles. There is a manpower shortage. More military aid won't make a bit of difference.

Only a surrender will preserve what is left of Ukraine.

[Zhang Fei]

Ukraine ping

Kazan: [We’ve already spent $150 billion on Ukraine and the Ukrainians have lost 20% of their territory.

Now, Ukraine’s military is shambles. There is a manpower shortage. More military aid won’t make a bit of difference.

Only a surrender will preserve what is left of Ukraine.]

---

$150b is peanuts. It’s 3 years of aid to Afghanistan, which was used to fight a bunch of part-time guerrillas. For a large scale conventional war like this over 2 years, it’s a pittance. Desert Storm - the retaking of Kuwait - involved 1 month of hostilities. The total tab in 1990 dollars was $60b. Adjusted for today’s prices, that 1 month total would be $140b.

Relative to its 1941 economy, the US sent 12% of a year’s output to the Russians. 12% of today’s economy would be 3T. We are well short of sending $300b, let alone $3T.