Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey says the abortion ruling from justices he chose goes too far
Daily Mail UK ^ | April 11, 2024 | AP

Posted on 04/12/2024 1:17:08 AM PDT by Morgana

A ban on nearly all abortions in Arizona doesn´t sit well with the Republican former governor whose expansion of the state Supreme Court allowed him to appoint the four conservative justices whose ruling cleared the way for it.

Doug Ducey is among Republicans in several states who are wrestling with the consequences of their opposition to abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. He expanded the state court in 2016, but thinks its ruling this week went too far.

After the Arizona court ruled 4-2 on Monday to revive an 1864 law that criminalizes abortion throughout pregnancy unless a woman´s life is at risk, Ducey posted on the platform X that it was "not the outcome I would have preferred." He said a law he signed in 2022 banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy was more in line with what voters want.

In Virginia, Kentucky and Ohio, where an abortion ban signed into law by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine got overturned in a referendum that enshrined the right to an abortion in the state constitution, the issue has helped Democrats win races and in some cases begin to reverse Republican-led bans.

More may be in store. In Florida, the state's high court cleared the way for a six-week ban that Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed while also allowing an abortion-rights referendum go before the state´s voters this November.

Abortion also is a major feature in the presidential race, potentially boosting turnout for Democrats and putting down-ballot Republicans on a back foot. Polls show most U.S. adults don´t support tough restrictions.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: abortion; arizona; prolife; rontards
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Morgana

Weird. A lot of us think that murdering innocent infants “goes too far” also. The same little bass turds who called Vietnam vets “baby killers” are now actually brutally murdering them every day as they innocently are trying to be born. Pro abortion maggots can go to hell.


21 posted on 04/12/2024 5:30:44 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I can't wait until the "media" is printing headlines like, "Trump Reverses Biden-era Policy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

The court is not a legislature. The ruling just held that the law still exists. It does not bar the legislature from changing the law.


22 posted on 04/12/2024 6:25:10 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Science says a human life begins at conception.


23 posted on 04/12/2024 6:39:08 AM PDT by bray (Science says a human life begins at conception.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Give the TDS a rest.


24 posted on 04/12/2024 7:29:04 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Excellent observation. I talk about this from time to time, and now they “care” about American babies and the mothers whom bring them life in our country, yet they welcome pregnant or expecting illegals into our nation without any resistance.

Also, be expected to hear about this crap for months to come because liberals have nothing else to bring up but this garbage, you know, because it’s an election year.

FJB x1000 and beyond


25 posted on 04/12/2024 7:37:45 AM PDT by Dominic01 (Political correctness has become a psychosis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If that law is there—SUCK IT UP!

How do you choose to not enforce something, legally, if it was formally rule as “legal?”

Idiots.


26 posted on 04/12/2024 7:47:25 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
An upthread poster had it right… the 21st century legislators were guilty of poorly written legislation. I suspect some already knew that but kept their mouths shut hoping for the current outcome and its aftermath,

"Its aftermath" includes:

  1. Media, including DNC and AZ ads, blaming Trump for what the AZ court ruled
  2. Some AZ GOP legislators trying to repeal the old law as a result, others (including dems?) voting against repeal
  3. TDS posters here blaming Trump for his criticism of the old law

Which were they hoping for?

27 posted on 04/12/2024 8:30:30 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
the people have spoken on abortion.

The people of Arizona spoke on abortion in 1864. They're going to speak again in 2024. They'll be saying something differently.

28 posted on 04/13/2024 11:21:35 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson