I'm confused.
A court saying that a law on the books is enforceable is going too far?
Why not just ask the legislation to repeal or change the law? Isn't that how it's supposed to be done?
Once again, cowardly politicians are afraid to vote on controversial things and hope the courts will do their job for them. When the court does not, they are "going too far?"
-PJ
It’s more confusing than that.
Ducey says here that he signed a law into effect in 2022 allowing abortions up to 15 weeks.
If so, why is that not now the law instead of the 1864 law prohibiting it entirely there?
“A court saying that a law on the books is enforceable is going too far?”
This is what the judge in NYC did to Trump. Applied a law close to 100 years old. If this changes in Arizona, Trump has a great appeal.